CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 335
Utility
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 540 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Steiger 335 vs Challenger 75
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 75
Articulated
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 335
vs
ChallengerChallenger 75
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Steiger 335 higher · +10 hp (+3%)Steiger 335335 hp
75325 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Steiger 335 is in the 97th percentile; 75 is in the 97th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 75 higher · +89 ci (+16%)Steiger 335540 ci
75629 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Steiger 335 is in the 94th percentile; 75 is in the 95th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSteiger 3356
756
Median Utility Tractor4
Steiger 335 is in the 93rd percentile; 75 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Steiger 335 higher · +6 (+60%)Steiger 33516
7510
Median Utility Tractor12
Steiger 335 is in the 73rd percentile; 75 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
Steiger 335 (A)75 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Steiger 335 | 75 | — |
| Category | Utility | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | Caterpillar | — |
| Power Output | 335hp | 325hp | ▲ Steiger 335+10 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 75+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 540ci | 629ci | ▲ 75+89 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.9in | ▲ 75+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.5in | ▲ Steiger 335+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full Power Shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 36.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 32,120lb | 34,370lb | ▲ 75+2,250 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Parallel pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Closed | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 11gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 97th percentile (335 hp)B · 97th percentile (325 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 94th percentile (540 ci)B · 95th percentile (629 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 98th percentile (32,120 lb)B · 98th percentile (34,370 lb)
A · Steiger 335B · 75Median Utility Tractor