CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 335
Utility
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 540 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Steiger 335 vs New Holland T9.435
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T9.435
Utility
- power
- 370 hp
- displacement
- 531 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 17
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 335
vs
New HollandNew Holland T9.435
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T9.435 higher · +35 hp (+10%)Steiger 335335 hp
T9.435370 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Steiger 335 is in the 97th percentile; T9.435 is in the 98th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Steiger 335 higher · +9 ci (+2%)Steiger 335540 ci
T9.435531 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Steiger 335 is in the 94th percentile; T9.435 is in the 94th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSteiger 3356
T9.4356
Median Utility Tractor4
Steiger 335 is in the 93rd percentile; T9.435 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ T9.435 higher · +1 (+6%)Steiger 33516
T9.43517
Median Utility Tractor12
Steiger 335 is in the 73rd percentile; T9.435 is in the 82nd · 4,941 models
Steiger 335 (A)T9.435 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | New Holland T9.435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Steiger 335 | T9.435 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | New Holland T9.435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | FPT | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Cursor 9 | — |
| Power Output | 335hp | 370hp | ▲ T9.435+35 hp · +10% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,000RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 540ci | 531ci | ▲ Steiger 335+9 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.6in | ▲ T9.435+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.3in | ▲ Steiger 335+0.4 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | New Holland T9.435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | New Holland T9.435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 291in | — |
| Width | 36.5in | 120in | ▲ T9.435+83.5 in · +229% |
| Height | Not recorded | 151in | — |
| Operating Weight | 32,120lb | 35,848lb | ▲ T9.435+3,728 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | New Holland T9.435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Parallel pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Closed center load sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power articulated | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | New Holland T9.435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | IVN* | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | New Holland T9.435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power articulated | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | New Holland T9.435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 335 | New Holland T9.435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier IV | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | Selective catalytic reduction and diesel oxidation catalyst | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 97th percentile (335 hp)B · 98th percentile (370 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 94th percentile (540 ci)B · 94th percentile (531 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 82nd percentile (17)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 98th percentile (32,120 lb)B · 98th percentile (35,848 lb)
A · Steiger 335B · T9.435Median Utility Tractor