Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 385
Utility
- power
- 385 hp
- displacement
- 786 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Steiger 385 vs Challenger 85E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 85E
Crawler
- power
- 375 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 385
vs
ChallengerChallenger 85E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Steiger 385 higher · +10 hp (+3%)Steiger 385385 hp
85E375 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Steiger 385 is in the 98th percentile; 85E is in the 98th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Steiger 385 higher · +57 ci (+8%)Steiger 385786 ci
85E729 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Steiger 385 is in the 96th percentile; 85E is in the 96th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSteiger 3856
85E6
Median Utility Tractor4
Steiger 385 is in the 93rd percentile; 85E is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Steiger 385 higher · +6 (+60%)Steiger 38516
85E10
Median Utility Tractor12
Steiger 385 is in the 73rd percentile; 85E is in the 39th · 4,941 models
Steiger 385 (A)85E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385 | Challenger 85E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Steiger 385 | 85E | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385 | Challenger 85E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iveco | Caterpillar | — |
| Power Output | 385hp | 375hp | ▲ Steiger 385+10 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 85E+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 786ci | 729ci | ▲ Steiger 385+57 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 5.3in | 5.1in | ▲ Steiger 385+0.2 in · +4% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 5.9in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385 | Challenger 85E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full Power Shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385 | Challenger 85E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 44in | 25in | ▲ Steiger 385+19 in · +76% |
| Operating Weight | 41,605lb | 34,895lb | ▲ Steiger 385+6,710 lb · +19% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385 | Challenger 85E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Parallel pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Closed | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385 | Challenger 85E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 4N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385 | Challenger 85E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385 | Challenger 85E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric Starter (24 volts) | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385 | Challenger 85E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 20gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 98th percentile (385 hp)B · 98th percentile (375 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 96th percentile (786 ci)B · 96th percentile (729 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 99th percentile (41,605 lb)B · 98th percentile (34,895 lb)
A · Steiger 385B · 85EMedian Utility Tractor