CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac
Articulated
- power
- 385 hp
- displacement
- 786 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Articulated
CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac vs Challenger MT765E
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT765E
Articulated
- power
- 405 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ MT765E higher · +20 hp (+5%)Steiger 385QT Quadtrac385 hp
MT765E405 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
Steiger 385QT Quadtrac is in the 32nd percentile; MT765E is in the 35th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Steiger 385QT Quadtrac higher · +187 ci (+31%)Steiger 385QT Quadtrac786 ci
MT765E599 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
Steiger 385QT Quadtrac is in the 25th percentile; MT765E is in the 6th · 61 models
Cylinders
▲ MT765E higher · +1 (+17%)Steiger 385QT Quadtrac6
MT765E7
Median Articulated Tractor6
Steiger 385QT Quadtrac is in the 50th percentile; MT765E is in the 92nd · 61 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedSteiger 385QT Quadtrac16
MT765E16
Median Articulated Tractor16
Steiger 385QT Quadtrac is in the 50th percentile; MT765E is in the 50th · 59 models
Steiger 385QT Quadtrac (A)MT765E (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | MT765E | — |
| Category | Articulated | Articulated | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iveco | AGCO POWER | — |
| Power Output | 385hp | 405hp | ▲ MT765E+20 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT765E+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 7 | ▲ MT765E+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 786ci | 599ci | ▲ Steiger 385QT Quadtrac+187 ci · +31% |
| Bore | 5.3in | 4.4in | ▲ Steiger 385QT Quadtrac+0.9 in · +20% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 5.7in | ▲ Steiger 385QT Quadtrac+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Powershift | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 44in | 120in | ▲ MT765E+76 in · +173% |
| Operating Weight | 48,150lb | 33,235lb | ▲ Steiger 385QT Quadtrac+14,915 lb · +45% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Electro-Hydraulic Differential | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Cat 3 | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | IVN/III | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 39,000lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Electro-Hydraulic Differential | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated by foot pedal | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Steiger 385QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 24V | 12V | ▲ Steiger 385QT Quadtrac+12 V · +100% |
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 32nd percentile (385 hp)B · 35th percentile (405 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 25th percentile (786 ci)B · 6th percentile (599 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 92nd percentile (7)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 42nd percentile (48,150 lb)B · 6th percentile (33,235 lb)
A · Steiger 385QT QuadtracB · MT765EMedian Articulated Tractor