Head to head · Agricultural

CaseIH STX275 vs Challenger MT738

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH STX275

Agricultural

power
275 hp
displacement
505 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full STX275 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT738

Crawler

power
325 hp
displacement
599 ci
Cylinders
7
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT738 specs
CaseIHCaseIH STX275
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT738

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 971–1,130

Engine Power

▲ MT738 higher · +50 hp (+18%)
STX275275 hp
MT738325 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

STX275 is in the 91st percentile; MT738 is in the 95th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT738 higher · +94 ci (+19%)
STX275505 ci
MT738599 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

STX275 is in the 85th percentile; MT738 is in the 92nd · 1,083 models

Cylinders

▲ MT738 higher · +1 (+17%)
STX2756
MT7387
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

STX275 is in the 74th percentile; MT738 is in the 98th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT738 higher · +4,265 lb (+13%)
STX27531,785 lb
MT73836,050 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

STX275 is in the 96th percentile; MT738 is in the 97th · 971 models

STX275 (A)MT738 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH STX275Challenger MT738Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHChallenger—
ModelSTX275MT738—
CategoryAgriculturalCrawler—

Engine

SpecCaseIH STX275Challenger MT738Difference
ManufacturerCDCAGCO—
Model6TAA-8304Power—
Power Output275hp325hp▲ MT738+50 hp · +18%
Rated RPM2,000RPM1,701RPM▲ STX275+299 RPM · +18%
Cylinders67▲ MT738+1 · +17%
Displacement505ci599ci▲ MT738+94 ci · +19%
Bore4.5in4.4in▲ STX275+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke5.3in5.7in▲ MT738+0.4 in · +8%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH STX275Challenger MT738Difference
TypeFull Power Shift, Fully SynchronizedCVT, infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH STX275Challenger MT738Difference
Length296inNot recorded—
Width36.5inNot recorded—
Height145inNot recorded—
Operating Weight31,785lb36,050lb▲ MT738+4,265 lb · +13%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH STX275Challenger MT738Difference
System TypePressure Flow Compensated (PFC)Load sensing—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerNot recorded—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH STX275Challenger MT738Difference
TypeRear 1000 (1.75)Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH STX275Challenger MT738Difference
Hitch TypeRearThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryIVN/IIIIII/IVN—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH STX275Challenger MT738Difference
Chassis TypeNot recordedTracklayer-rubber tracked—
Drive TypeNot recordedTrack—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH STX275Challenger MT738Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 91st percentile (275 hp)B · 95th percentile (325 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 85th percentile (505 ci)B · 92nd percentile (599 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 98th percentile (7)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 96th percentile (31,785 lb)B · 97th percentile (36,050 lb)
A · STX275B · MT738Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH STX275Full spec pageChallenger MT738