Head to head · Articulated

CaseIH STX375QT Quadtrac vs Challenger 85E

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger 85E

Crawler

power
375 hp
displacement
729 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
10
Full 85E specs
CaseIHCaseIH STX375QT Quadtrac
vs
ChallengerChallenger 85E

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated

n = 41–62

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
STX375QT Quadtrac375 hp
85E375 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp

STX375QT Quadtrac is in the 27th percentile; 85E is in the 27th · 62 models

Engine Displacement

▲ STX375QT Quadtrac higher · +186 ci (+26%)
STX375QT Quadtrac915 ci
85E729 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci

STX375QT Quadtrac is in the 78th percentile; 85E is in the 20th · 61 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
STX375QT Quadtrac6
85E6
Median Articulated Tractor6

STX375QT Quadtrac is in the 50th percentile; 85E is in the 50th · 61 models

Forward Gears

▲ STX375QT Quadtrac higher · +6 (+60%)
STX375QT Quadtrac16
85E10
Median Articulated Tractor16

STX375QT Quadtrac is in the 50th percentile; 85E is in the 3rd · 59 models

STX375QT Quadtrac (A)85E (B)Median Articulated Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH STX375QT QuadtracChallenger 85EDifference
ManufacturerCaseIHChallenger—
ModelSTX375QT Quadtrac85E—
CategoryArticulatedCrawler—

Engine

SpecCaseIH STX375QT QuadtracChallenger 85EDifference
ManufacturerCumminsCaterpillar—
ModelQSX15Not recorded—
Power Output375hp375hpSame
Rated RPM2,000RPM2,100RPM▲ 85E+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement915ci729ci▲ STX375QT Quadtrac+186 ci · +26%
Bore5.4in5.1in▲ STX375QT Quadtrac+0.3 in · +6%
Stroke6.7in5.9in▲ STX375QT Quadtrac+0.8 in · +14%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH STX375QT QuadtracChallenger 85EDifference
TypeFull Power ShiftFull Power ShiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH STX375QT QuadtracChallenger 85EDifference
Width44in25in▲ STX375QT Quadtrac+19 in · +76%
Operating Weight53,264lb34,895lb▲ STX375QT Quadtrac+18,369 lb · +53%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH STX375QT QuadtracChallenger 85EDifference
System TypePressure Flow CompensatedClosed—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic Differential Steering—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH STX375QT QuadtracChallenger 85EDifference
Hitch TypeIVN/IIINot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH STX375QT QuadtracChallenger 85EDifference
Chassis Type4X4Not recorded—
Drive TypeQuad TrackNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic Differential Steering—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH STX375QT QuadtracChallenger 85EDifference
Battery VoltageNot recorded12V—
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecCaseIH STX375QT QuadtracChallenger 85EDifference
CoolantNot recorded20gal—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 450 hp
A · 27th percentile (375 hp)B · 27th percentile (375 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 827 ci
A · 78th percentile (915 ci)B · 20th percentile (729 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 3rd percentile (10)

Operating Weight

median 51,335 lb
A · 57th percentile (53,264 lb)B · 15th percentile (34,895 lb)
A · STX375QT QuadtracB · 85EMedian Articulated Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH STX375QT QuadtracFull spec pageChallenger 85E