Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH STX500QT Quadtrac
Articulated
- power
- 500 hp
- displacement
- 915 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Articulated
CaseIH STX500QT Quadtrac vs Challenger MT955E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT955E
Articulated
- power
- 500 hp
- displacement
- 1,025 ci
- Cylinders
- 12
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH STX500QT Quadtrac
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT955E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedSTX500QT Quadtrac500 hp
MT955E500 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
STX500QT Quadtrac is in the 69th percentile; MT955E is in the 69th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT955E higher · +110 ci (+12%)STX500QT Quadtrac915 ci
MT955E1,025 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
STX500QT Quadtrac is in the 78th percentile; MT955E is in the 91st · 61 models
Cylinders
▲ MT955E higher · +6 (+100%)STX500QT Quadtrac6
MT955E12
Median Articulated Tractor6
STX500QT Quadtrac is in the 50th percentile; MT955E is in the 97th · 61 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedSTX500QT Quadtrac16
MT955E16
Median Articulated Tractor16
STX500QT Quadtrac is in the 50th percentile; MT955E is in the 50th · 59 models
STX500QT Quadtrac (A)MT955E (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH STX500QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT955E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | STX500QT Quadtrac | MT955E | — |
| Category | Articulated | Articulated | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH STX500QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT955E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | AGCO Power | — |
| Power Output | 500hp | 500hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,900RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 12 | ▲ MT955E+6 · +100% |
| Displacement | 915ci | 1,025ci | ▲ MT955E+110 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 5.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 6.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH STX500QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT955E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH STX500QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT955E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 53,264lb | 47,500lb | ▲ STX500QT Quadtrac+5,764 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH STX500QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT955E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure Flow Compensating | Closed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH STX500QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT955E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH STX500QT Quadtrac | Challenger MT955E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12 Volts | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 69th percentile (500 hp)B · 69th percentile (500 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 78th percentile (915 ci)B · 91st percentile (1,025 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 97th percentile (12)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 57th percentile (53,264 lb)B · 38th percentile (47,500 lb)
A · STX500QT QuadtracB · MT955EMedian Articulated Tractor