CaterpillarModel A
Caterpillar 416C
Specialized
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Specialized
Caterpillar 416C vs Ford 650 Backhoe loader
FordModel B
Ford 650 Backhoe loader
Specialized
- power
- 75.5 hp
- displacement
- 256 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaterpillarCaterpillar 416C
vs
FordFord 650 Backhoe loader
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Specialized
Engine Power
▲ 650 Backhoe loader higher · +0.5 hp (<1%)416C75 hp
650 Backhoe loader75.5 hp
Median Specialized Tractor62 hp
416C is in the 65th percentile; 650 Backhoe loader is in the 68th · 55 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 416C higher · +12 ci (+5%)416C268 ci
650 Backhoe loader256 ci
Median Specialized Tractor239 ci
416C is in the 62nd percentile; 650 Backhoe loader is in the 57th · 56 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied416C4
650 Backhoe loader4
Median Specialized Tractor4
416C is in the 50th percentile; 650 Backhoe loader is in the 50th · 58 models
416C (A)650 Backhoe loader (B)Median Specialized Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | Ford 650 Backhoe loader | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Ford | — |
| Model | 416C | 650 Backhoe loader | — |
| Category | Specialized, Backhoe Loader | Specialized, Backhoe Loader | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | Ford 650 Backhoe loader | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Ford | — |
| Model | 3054 | Ford | — |
| Power Output | 75hp | 75.5hp | ▲ 650 Backhoe loader+0.5 hp · <1% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 268ci | 256ci | ▲ 416C+12 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.4in | ▲ 650 Backhoe loader+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.2in | ▲ 416C+0.8 in · +19% |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | Ford 650 Backhoe loader | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 274in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 92.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 141in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 13,966lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | Ford 650 Backhoe loader | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | Ford 650 Backhoe loader | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | 16.9-24 | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | Ford 650 Backhoe loader | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Multiple Discs | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | Ford 650 Backhoe loader | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | Ford 650 Backhoe loader | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open (Four-post ROPS) | Open operator station with four-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 62 hpA · 65th percentile (75 hp)B · 68th percentile (75.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 239 ciA · 62nd percentile (268 ci)B · 57th percentile (256 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
A · 416CB · 650 Backhoe loaderMedian Specialized Tractor