CaterpillarModel A
Caterpillar 416C
Specialized
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Backhoe Loader
Caterpillar 416C vs John Deere 410C
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 410C
Backhoe Loader
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- 276 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
CaterpillarCaterpillar 416C
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 410C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Backhoe Loader
Engine Power
= Effectively tied416C75 hp
410C75 hp
Median Backhoe Loader Tractor66 hp
416C is in the 62nd percentile; 410C is in the 62nd · 49 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 410C higher · +8 ci (+3%)416C268 ci
410C276 ci
Median Backhoe Loader Tractor239 ci
416C is in the 64th percentile; 410C is in the 87th · 50 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied416C4
410C4
Median Backhoe Loader Tractor4
416C is in the 50th percentile; 410C is in the 50th · 50 models
Operating Weight
▲ 410C higher · +430 lb (+3%)416C13,966 lb
410C14,396 lb
Median Backhoe Loader Tractor12,998 lb
416C is in the 65th percentile; 410C is in the 71st · 44 models
416C (A)410C (B)Median Backhoe Loader Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | John Deere | — |
| Model | 416C | 410C | — |
| Category | Specialized, Backhoe Loader | Backhoe Loader | — |
Engine
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | John Deere | — |
| Model | 3054 | 4276D | — |
| Power Output | 75hp | 75hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,200RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 268ci | 276ci | ▲ 410C+8 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.2in | ▲ 410C+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5in | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 274in | 281in | ▲ 410C+7 in · +3% |
| Width | 92.5in | 81.9in | ▲ 416C+10.6 in · +13% |
| Height | 141in | 104in | ▲ 416C+37 in · +36% |
| Operating Weight | 13,966lb | 14,396lb | ▲ 410C+430 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | 16.9-24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Multiple Discs | Differential hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 4.3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Caterpillar 416C | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open (Four-post ROPS) | ROPS canopy | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 66 hpA · 62nd percentile (75 hp)B · 62nd percentile (75 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 239 ciA · 64th percentile (268 ci)B · 87th percentile (276 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 12,998 lbA · 65th percentile (13,966 lb)B · 71st percentile (14,396 lb)
Length
median 276 inA · 45th percentile (274 in)B · 74th percentile (281 in)
A · 416CB · 410CMedian Backhoe Loader Tractor