Head to head · Utility
CBT 1000 vs Fendt 209V
FendtModel B
Fendt 209V
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CBTCBT 1000
vs
FendtFendt 209V
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 1000 higher · +2 ci (<1%)1000203 ci
209V201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1000 is in the 56th percentile; 209V is in the 55th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 1000 higher · +1 (+33%)10004
209V3
Median Utility Tractor4
1000 is in the 50th percentile; 209V is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1000 higher · +353 lb (+6%)10006,041 lb
209V5,688 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1000 is in the 57th percentile; 209V is in the 53rd · 5,107 models
Length
▲ 209V higher · +19 in (+16%)1000122 in
209V141 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
1000 is in the 30th percentile; 209V is in the 56th · 4,659 models
1000 (A)209V (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CBT 1000 | Fendt 209V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CBT | Fendt | — |
| Model | 1000 | 209V | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | — |
Engine
| Spec | CBT 1000 | Fendt 209V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | 4.203 | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 209V+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 1000+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 203ci | 201ci | ▲ 1000+2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CBT 1000 | Fendt 209V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Continuously-variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CBT 1000 | Fendt 209V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 141in | ▲ 209V+19 in · +16% |
| Width | Not recorded | 45.3in | — |
| Height | 59.1in | 95in | ▲ 209V+35.9 in · +61% |
| Operating Weight | 6,041lb | 5,688lb | ▲ 1000+353 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CBT 1000 | Fendt 209V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CBT 1000 | Fendt 209V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CBT 1000 | Fendt 209V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CBT 1000 | Fendt 209V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 56th percentile (203 ci)B · 55th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 57th percentile (6,041 lb)B · 53rd percentile (5,688 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 30th percentile (122 in)B · 56th percentile (141 in)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 9th percentile (59.1 in)B · 52nd percentile (95 in)
A · 1000B · 209VMedian Utility Tractor