Head to head · Agricultural

CBT 1020 vs CBT 8260

Image not recorded
CBTModel A

CBT 1020

Agricultural

power
Not recorded
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 1020 specs
Image not recorded
CBTModel B

CBT 8260

Agricultural

power
Not recorded
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
6
Full 8260 specs
CBTCBT 1020
vs
CBTCBT 8260

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 9711,130

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
10206
82606
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

1020 is in the 74th percentile; 8260 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ 8260 higher · +2,848 lb (+33%)
10208,752 lb
826011,600 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

1020 is in the 38th percentile; 8260 is in the 53rd · 971 models

1020 (A)8260 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCBT 1020CBT 8260Difference
ManufacturerCBTCBTSame
Model10208260
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecCBT 1020CBT 8260Difference
ManufacturerMercedes-BenzPerkins
ModelOM-3216.354
Rated RPM2,000RPMNot recorded
Cylinders66Same

Transmission

SpecCBT 1020CBT 8260Difference
TypeNot recordedManual

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCBT 1020CBT 8260Difference
Length142inNot recorded
Width84.7inNot recorded
Height72.8inNot recorded
Operating Weight8,752lb11,600lb8260+2,848 lb · +33%

Tread Width

SpecCBT 1020CBT 8260Difference
Rear Tread15inNot recorded

Chassis & Drive

SpecCBT 1020CBT 8260Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x4
Drive Type2WDMFWD 4WD

Electrical

SpecCBT 1020CBT 8260Difference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded

Category context

Both models against the field

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 38th percentile (8,752 lb)B · 53rd percentile (11,600 lb)
A · 1020B · 8260Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageCBT 1020Full spec pageCBT 8260