Head to head · Utility
CBT 2105 vs Cockshutt 1800
CockshuttModel B
Cockshutt 1800
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 310 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
CBTCBT 2105
vs
CockshuttCockshutt 1800
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 2105 higher · +36 ci (+12%)2105346 ci
1800310 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
2105 is in the 86th percentile; 1800 is in the 85th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied21056
18006
Median Utility Tractor4
2105 is in the 93rd percentile; 1800 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied21056
18006
Median Utility Tractor12
2105 is in the 11th percentile; 1800 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1800 higher · +651 lb (+8%)21058,554 lb
18009,205 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
2105 is in the 79th percentile; 1800 is in the 83rd · 5,107 models
2105 (A)1800 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CBT 2105 | Cockshutt 1800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CBT | Cockshutt | — |
| Model | 2105 | 1800 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CBT 2105 | Cockshutt 1800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz | Waukesha-Oliver | — |
| Model | OM-352 | 5.1L 6-cyl diesel | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 346ci | 310ci | ▲ 2105+36 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 3.8in | 3.9in | ▲ 1800+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.4in | ▲ 2105+0.6 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | CBT 2105 | Cockshutt 1800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 6-Speed | Gear / Partial Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CBT 2105 | Cockshutt 1800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 158in | 160in | ▲ 1800+2 in · +1% |
| Width | 86.2in | 86.5in | ▲ 1800+0.3 in · <1% |
| Height | 102in | 79.9in | ▲ 2105+22.1 in · +28% |
| Operating Weight | 8,554lb | 9,205lb | ▲ 1800+651 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CBT 2105 | Cockshutt 1800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power Assist | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CBT 2105 | Cockshutt 1800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power Assist | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CBT 2105 | Cockshutt 1800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CBT 2105 | Cockshutt 1800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.6gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 86th percentile (346 ci)B · 85th percentile (310 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 11th percentile (6)B · 11th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 79th percentile (8,554 lb)B · 83rd percentile (9,205 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 74th percentile (158 in)B · 77th percentile (160 in)
A · 2105B · 1800Median Utility Tractor