Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CBT 3000 vs Farmall Hydro 70
FarmallModel B
Farmall Hydro 70
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 291 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CBTCBT 3000
vs
FarmallFarmall Hydro 70
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 3000 higher · +27 ci (+9%)3000318 ci
Hydro 70291 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
3000 is in the 85th percentile; Hydro 70 is in the 84th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 3000 higher · +2 (+33%)30008
Hydro 706
Median Utility Tractor4
3000 is in the 99th percentile; Hydro 70 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 3000 higher · +431 lb (+5%)30008,631 lb
Hydro 708,200 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
3000 is in the 80th percentile; Hydro 70 is in the 77th · 5,107 models
3000 (A)Hydro 70 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CBT 3000 | Farmall Hydro 70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CBT | Farmall | — |
| Model | 3000 | Hydro 70 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CBT 3000 | Farmall Hydro 70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Dodge | International Harvester | — |
| Model | 318-3E | 4.8L 6-cyl Gasoline | — |
| Power Output | 112hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ Hydro 70+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 8 | 6 | ▲ 3000+2 · +33% |
| Displacement | 318ci | 291ci | ▲ 3000+27 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.8in | ▲ 3000+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 4.4in | ▲ Hydro 70+1.1 in · +33% |
Transmission
| Spec | CBT 3000 | Farmall Hydro 70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 6-speed | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CBT 3000 | Farmall Hydro 70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 158in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 86.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 105in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,631lb | 8,200lb | ▲ 3000+431 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CBT 3000 | Farmall Hydro 70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CBT 3000 | Farmall Hydro 70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CBT 3000 | Farmall Hydro 70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CBT 3000 | Farmall Hydro 70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CBT 3000 | Farmall Hydro 70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.6gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 85th percentile (318 ci)B · 84th percentile (291 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 99th percentile (8)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 80th percentile (8,631 lb)B · 77th percentile (8,200 lb)
A · 3000B · Hydro 70Median Utility Tractor