Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CBT 8240 vs Fiat 765C
Image not recorded
CBTCBT 8240
vs
FiatFiat 765C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 8240 higher · +3 hp (+4%)824080 hp
765C77 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
8240 is in the 71st percentile; 765C is in the 69th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8240 higher · +7 ci (+3%)8240231 ci
765C224 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
8240 is in the 63rd percentile; 765C is in the 61st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied82404
765C4
Median Utility Tractor4
8240 is in the 50th percentile; 765C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 765C higher · +10 (+167%)82406
765C16
Median Utility Tractor12
8240 is in the 11th percentile; 765C is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
8240 (A)765C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CBT 8240 | Fiat 765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CBT | Fiat | — |
| Model | 8240 | 765C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CBT 8240 | Fiat 765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Fiat | — |
| Model | 3.8L 4-cyl ethanol | 8045.04 | — |
| Power Output | 80hp | 77hp | ▲ 8240+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 765C+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 231ci | 224ci | ▲ 8240+7 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.1in | ▲ 765C+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.3in | ▲ 8240+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | CBT 8240 | Fiat 765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 6-Speed | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CBT 8240 | Fiat 765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 158in | 126in | ▲ 8240+32 in · +25% |
| Width | 79.8in | 66.1in | ▲ 8240+13.7 in · +21% |
| Height | 108in | 87.4in | ▲ 8240+20.6 in · +24% |
| Operating Weight | 8,400lb | 9,039lb | ▲ 765C+639 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CBT 8240 | Fiat 765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CBT 8240 | Fiat 765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 2 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CBT 8240 | Fiat 765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CBT 8240 | Fiat 765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CBT 8240 | Fiat 765C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 71st percentile (80 hp)B · 69th percentile (77 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (231 ci)B · 61st percentile (224 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 11th percentile (6)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 78th percentile (8,400 lb)B · 82nd percentile (9,039 lb)
A · 8240B · 765CMedian Utility Tractor