Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1038
Agricultural
- power
- 396 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 1038 vs Challenger 95E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 95E
Agricultural
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
ChallengerChallenger 1038
vs
ChallengerChallenger 95E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 95E higher · +14 hp (+4%)1038396 hp
95E410 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
1038 is in the 97th percentile; 95E is in the 97th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1038 higher · +29 ci (+4%)1038758 ci
95E729 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
1038 is in the 96th percentile; 95E is in the 95th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied10386
95E6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
1038 is in the 74th percentile; 95E is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 95E higher · +3,905 lb (+12%)103831,615 lb
95E35,520 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
1038 is in the 95th percentile; 95E is in the 97th · 971 models
1038 (A)95E (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 1038 | 95E | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | Caterpillar | — |
| Power Output | 396hp | 410hp | ▲ 95E+14 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 95E+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 758ci | 729ci | ▲ 1038+29 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 5in | 5.1in | ▲ 95E+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 5.9in | ▲ 1038+0.6 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-Variable Transmission | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 108in | 25in | ▲ 1038+83 in · +332% |
| Height | 136in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | 130in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 31,615lb | 35,520lb | ▲ 95E+3,905 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load-sensing | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type IV | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Crawler | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Tracks | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic caliper disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric (24V) | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 20gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Challenger 95E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 97th percentile (396 hp)B · 97th percentile (410 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 96th percentile (758 ci)B · 95th percentile (729 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 95th percentile (31,615 lb)B · 97th percentile (35,520 lb)
Width
median 79.5 inA · 91st percentile (108 in)B · 1st percentile (25 in)
A · 1038B · 95EMedian Agricultural Tractor