Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1038
Agricultural
- power
- 396 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 1038 vs Fendt 1151 Vario MT
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 1151 Vario MT
Crawler
- power
- 504 hp
- displacement
- 930 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 1038
vs
FendtFendt 1151 Vario MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 1151 Vario MT higher · +108 hp (+27%)1038396 hp
1151 Vario MT504 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
1038 is in the 97th percentile; 1151 Vario MT is in the 99th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1151 Vario MT higher · +172 ci (+23%)1038758 ci
1151 Vario MT930 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
1038 is in the 96th percentile; 1151 Vario MT is in the 98th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied10386
1151 Vario MT6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
1038 is in the 74th percentile; 1151 Vario MT is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1151 Vario MT higher · +10,810 lb (+34%)103831,615 lb
1151 Vario MT42,425 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
1038 is in the 95th percentile; 1151 Vario MT is in the 98th · 971 models
1038 (A)1151 Vario MT (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Fendt 1151 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | 1038 | 1151 Vario MT | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Crawler, Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Fendt 1151 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | MAN | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | D3876 | — |
| Power Output | 396hp | 504hp | ▲ 1151 Vario MT+108 hp · +27% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 1,730RPM | ▲ 1151 Vario MT+30 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 758ci | 930ci | ▲ 1151 Vario MT+172 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 5in | 5.4in | ▲ 1151 Vario MT+0.4 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 6.7in | ▲ 1151 Vario MT+0.2 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Fendt 1151 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-Variable Transmission | Continuously-variable transmission | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Fendt 1151 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | 266in | ▲ 1151 Vario MT+24 in · +10% |
| Width | 108in | 92.5in | ▲ 1038+15.5 in · +17% |
| Height | 136in | 148in | ▲ 1151 Vario MT+12 in · +9% |
| Wheelbase | 130in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 31,615lb | 42,425lb | ▲ 1151 Vario MT+10,810 lb · +34% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Fendt 1151 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load-sensing | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Fendt 1151 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Fendt 1151 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Crawler | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1038 | Fendt 1151 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric (24V) | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 97th percentile (396 hp)B · 99th percentile (504 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 96th percentile (758 ci)B · 98th percentile (930 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 95th percentile (31,615 lb)B · 98th percentile (42,425 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 95th percentile (242 in)B · 99th percentile (266 in)
A · 1038B · 1151 Vario MTMedian Agricultural Tractor