Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Challenger 1042 vs Challenger MT835C

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger 1042

Four-Wheel Drive

power
410 hp
displacement
758 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 1042 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT835C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
402 hp
displacement
928 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT835C specs
ChallengerChallenger 1042
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT835C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 98–162

Engine Power

▲ 1042 higher · +8 hp (+2%)
1042410 hp
MT835C402 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

1042 is in the 56th percentile; MT835C is in the 55th · 162 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT835C higher · +170 ci (+22%)
1042758 ci
MT835C928 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci

1042 is in the 28th percentile; MT835C is in the 84th · 152 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
10426
MT835C6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6

1042 is in the 50th percentile; MT835C is in the 50th · 159 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT835C higher · +18,385 lb (+58%)
104231,615 lb
MT835C50,000 lb
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor37,428 lb

1042 is in the 35th percentile; MT835C is in the 88th · 132 models

1042 (A)MT835C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger 1042Challenger MT835CDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
Model1042MT835C—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveFour-Wheel DriveSame

Engine

SpecChallenger 1042Challenger MT835CDifference
ManufacturerMANCaterpillar—
ModelNot recordedC15 ACERT—
Power Output410hp402hp▲ 1042+8 hp · +2%
Rated RPM1,700RPM2,100RPM▲ MT835C+400 RPM · +24%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement758ci928ci▲ MT835C+170 ci · +22%
Bore5in5.4in▲ MT835C+0.4 in · +8%
Stroke6.5in6.8in▲ MT835C+0.3 in · +5%

Transmission

SpecChallenger 1042Challenger MT835CDifference
TypeContinuously-Variable TransmissionSelective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger 1042Challenger MT835CDifference
Length242in270in▲ MT835C+28 in · +12%
WidthNot recorded142in—
Height136in138in▲ MT835C+2 in · +1%
Operating Weight31,615lb50,000lb▲ MT835C+18,385 lb · +58%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger 1042Challenger MT835CDifference
System TypeLoad-SensingClosed center pressure-flow compensated—
Steering TypeNot recordedSpeed sensitive differential—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger 1042Challenger MT835CDifference
Hitch CategoryIVIVN—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger 1042Challenger MT835CDifference
Chassis TypeFront wheel assistNot recorded—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Steering TypeNot recordedSpeed sensitive differential—
Brake TypeWet multiple disc, hydraulically operatedWet multiple disc hydraulically actuated—

Electrical

SpecChallenger 1042Challenger MT835CDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectric, 12 volt—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 56th percentile (410 hp)B · 55th percentile (402 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 826 ci
A · 28th percentile (758 ci)B · 84th percentile (928 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 37,428 lb
A · 35th percentile (31,615 lb)B · 88th percentile (50,000 lb)

Length

median 275 in
A · 17th percentile (242 in)B · 43rd percentile (270 in)
A · 1042B · MT835CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger 1042Full spec pageChallenger MT835C