Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1042
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger 1042 vs New Holland T9.450
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T9.450
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 405 hp
- displacement
- 787 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger 1042
vs
New HollandNew Holland T9.450
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 1042 higher · +5 hp (+1%)1042410 hp
T9.450405 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
1042 is in the 56th percentile; T9.450 is in the 55th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T9.450 higher · +29 ci (+4%)1042758 ci
T9.450787 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
1042 is in the 28th percentile; T9.450 is in the 39th · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied10426
T9.4506
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
1042 is in the 50th percentile; T9.450 is in the 50th · 159 models
Length
▲ T9.450 higher · +53 in (+22%)1042242 in
T9.450295 in
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor275 in
1042 is in the 17th percentile; T9.450 is in the 67th · 104 models
1042 (A)T9.450 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | New Holland T9.450 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | New Holland | — |
| Model | 1042 | T9.450 | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | New Holland T9.450 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 410hp | 405hp | ▲ 1042+5 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ T9.450+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 758ci | 787ci | ▲ T9.450+29 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 5in | 5.3in | ▲ T9.450+0.3 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 5.9in | ▲ 1042+0.6 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | New Holland T9.450 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-Variable Transmission | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | New Holland T9.450 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | 295in | ▲ T9.450+53 in · +22% |
| Width | Not recorded | 36.5in | — |
| Height | 136in | 144in | ▲ T9.450+8 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 31,615lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | New Holland T9.450 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load-Sensing | Closed center load sensing | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | New Holland T9.450 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | IV | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 49,500lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | New Holland T9.450 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Front wheel assist | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc, hydraulically operated | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | New Holland T9.450 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 1042 | New Holland T9.450 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 21.1gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 56th percentile (410 hp)B · 55th percentile (405 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 28th percentile (758 ci)B · 39th percentile (787 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Length
median 275 inA · 17th percentile (242 in)B · 67th percentile (295 in)
Height
median 143 inA · 27th percentile (136 in)B · 54th percentile (144 in)
A · 1042B · T9.450Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor