ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1046
Agricultural
- power
- 446 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 1046 vs Challenger 55
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 55
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 442 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger 1046
vs
ChallengerChallenger 55
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ 1046 higher · +316 ci (+71%)1046758 ci
55442 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
1046 is in the 96th percentile; 55 is in the 78th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied10466
556
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
1046 is in the 74th percentile; 55 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1046 higher · +4,865 lb (+19%)104630,865 lb
5526,000 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
1046 is in the 94th percentile; 55 is in the 93rd · 971 models
Length
▲ 1046 higher · +31 in (+15%)1046242 in
55211 in
Median Agricultural Tractor173 in
1046 is in the 95th percentile; 55 is in the 86th · 829 models
1046 (A)55 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 1046 | 55 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3126 | — |
| Power Output | 446hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 55+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 758ci | 442ci | ▲ 1046+316 ci · +71% |
| Bore | 5in | 4.3in | ▲ 1046+0.7 in · +16% |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 5in | ▲ 1046+1.5 in · +30% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CONTINOUSLY VARIABLE TRANSMISSION | Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | 211in | ▲ 1046+31 in · +15% |
| Width | 108in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 136in | 125in | ▲ 1046+11 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 30,865lb | 26,000lb | ▲ 1046+4,865 lb · +19% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load sensing | Variable-Displacement Load-Sensing Pressure-Compensated | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 61.3gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Differential Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 650/65R38 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 750/75R46 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | IV/IVN | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Differential Power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc hydraulically operated by foot pedal | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 8.6gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 96th percentile (758 ci)B · 78th percentile (442 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 94th percentile (30,865 lb)B · 93rd percentile (26,000 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 95th percentile (242 in)B · 86th percentile (211 in)
Height
median 111 inA · 94th percentile (136 in)B · 84th percentile (125 in)
A · 1046B · 55Median Agricultural Tractor