ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1046
Agricultural
- power
- 446 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 1046 vs Challenger MT575B MFWD
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT575B MFWD
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 1046
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT575B MFWD
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ 1046 higher · +355 ci (+88%)1046758 ci
MT575B MFWD403 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
1046 is in the 96th percentile; MT575B MFWD is in the 68th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied10466
MT575B MFWD6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
1046 is in the 74th percentile; MT575B MFWD is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1046 higher · +14,765 lb (+92%)104630,865 lb
MT575B MFWD16,100 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
1046 is in the 94th percentile; MT575B MFWD is in the 74th · 971 models
Length
▲ 1046 higher · +226 in (+1422%)1046242 in
MT575B MFWD15.9 in
Median Agricultural Tractor173 in
1046 is in the 95th percentile; MT575B MFWD is in the 1st · 829 models
1046 (A)MT575B MFWD (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 1046 | MT575B MFWD | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | Not recorded | — |
| Model | Not recorded | C6.6 ACERT | — |
| Power Output | 446hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT575B MFWD+500 RPM · +29% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 758ci | 403ci | ▲ 1046+355 ci · +88% |
| Bore | 5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 6.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CONTINOUSLY VARIABLE TRANSMISSION | Auto Power | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | 15.9in | ▲ 1046+226 in · +1422% |
| Width | 108in | 81.6in | ▲ 1046+26.4 in · +32% |
| Height | 136in | 124in | ▲ 1046+12 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 30,865lb | 16,100lb | ▲ 1046+14,765 lb · +92% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 61.3gpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 650/65R38 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 750/75R46 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | IV/IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 14,284lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | Not recorded | MFWD | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc hydraulically operated by foot pedal | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.8gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 96th percentile (758 ci)B · 68th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 94th percentile (30,865 lb)B · 74th percentile (16,100 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 95th percentile (242 in)B · 1st percentile (15.9 in)
Width
median 79.5 inA · 91st percentile (108 in)B · 54th percentile (81.6 in)
A · 1046B · MT575B MFWDMedian Agricultural Tractor