ChallengerModel A
Challenger 1046
Agricultural
- power
- 446 hp
- displacement
- 758 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 1046 vs Fendt 1046
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 1046
Agricultural
- power
- 443 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 1046
vs
FendtFendt 1046
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 1046 higher · +3 hp (<1%)1046446 hp
1046443 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
1046 is in the 98th percentile; 1046 is in the 98th · 1,028 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied10466
10466
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
1046 is in the 74th percentile; 1046 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1046 higher · +750 lb (+2%)104630,865 lb
104631,615 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
1046 is in the 94th percentile; 1046 is in the 95th · 971 models
Length
▲ 1046 higher · +1 in (<1%)1046242 in
1046243 in
Median Agricultural Tractor173 in
1046 is in the 95th percentile; 1046 is in the 96th · 829 models
1046 (A)1046 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Fendt 1046 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | 1046 | 1046 | Same |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Fendt 1046 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 446hp | 443hp | ▲ 1046+3 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 1,700RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 758ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | 5in | 5in | Same |
| Stroke | 6.5in | 6.5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Fendt 1046 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CONTINOUSLY VARIABLE TRANSMISSION | Stepless VarioDrive transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Fendt 1046 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | 243in | ▲ 1046+1 in · <1% |
| Width | 108in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 136in | 142in | ▲ 1046+6 in · +4% |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 130in | — |
| Operating Weight | 30,865lb | 31,615lb | ▲ 1046+750 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Fendt 1046 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 61.3gpm | 61.3gpm | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Fendt 1046 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 650/65R38 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 750/75R46 | Not recorded | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Fendt 1046 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | Not recorded | 79.9in | — |
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 74.8in | — |
| Front Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 79.9 to 88.6 in | — |
| Rear Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 74.8 to 88.6 in | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Fendt 1046 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | IV/IVN | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 16,890lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Fendt 1046 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc hydraulically operated by foot pedal | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 1046 | Fendt 1046 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 98th percentile (446 hp)B · 98th percentile (443 hp)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 94th percentile (30,865 lb)B · 95th percentile (31,615 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 95th percentile (242 in)B · 96th percentile (243 in)
Height
median 111 inA · 94th percentile (136 in)B · 97th percentile (142 in)
A · 1046B · 1046Median Agricultural Tractor