ChallengerModel A
Challenger 55
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 442 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 55 vs Challenger MT575B MFWD
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT575B MFWD
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 55
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT575B MFWD
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ 55 higher · +39 ci (+10%)55442 ci
MT575B MFWD403 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
55 is in the 78th percentile; MT575B MFWD is in the 68th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied556
MT575B MFWD6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
55 is in the 74th percentile; MT575B MFWD is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 55 higher · +9,900 lb (+61%)5526,000 lb
MT575B MFWD16,100 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
55 is in the 93rd percentile; MT575B MFWD is in the 74th · 971 models
Length
▲ 55 higher · +195 in (+1227%)55211 in
MT575B MFWD15.9 in
Median Agricultural Tractor173 in
55 is in the 86th percentile; MT575B MFWD is in the 1st · 829 models
55 (A)MT575B MFWD (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 55 | MT575B MFWD | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 3126 | C6.6 ACERT | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT575B MFWD+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 442ci | 403ci | ▲ 55+39 ci · +10% |
| Bore | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Auto Power | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 211in | 15.9in | ▲ 55+195 in · +1227% |
| Width | Not recorded | 81.6in | — |
| Height | 125in | 124in | ▲ 55+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 26,000lb | 16,100lb | ▲ 55+9,900 lb · +61% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Variable-Displacement Load-Sensing Pressure-Compensated | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Differential Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 14,284lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | Not recorded | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Differential Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.6gal | 6.8gal | ▲ 55+1.8 gal · +26% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 55 | Challenger MT575B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 78th percentile (442 ci)B · 68th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 93rd percentile (26,000 lb)B · 74th percentile (16,100 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 86th percentile (211 in)B · 1st percentile (15.9 in)
Height
median 111 inA · 84th percentile (125 in)B · 82nd percentile (124 in)
A · 55B · MT575B MFWDMedian Agricultural Tractor