ChallengerModel A
Challenger 55
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 442 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 55 vs John Deere 7020
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 7020
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 404 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 8
ChallengerChallenger 55
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 7020
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ 55 higher · +38 ci (+9%)55442 ci
7020404 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
55 is in the 78th percentile; 7020 is in the 68th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied556
70206
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
55 is in the 74th percentile; 7020 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ 55 higher · +8 (+100%)5516
70208
Median Agricultural Tractor16
55 is in the 50th percentile; 7020 is in the 16th · 972 models
Operating Weight
▲ 55 higher · +7,505 lb (+41%)5526,000 lb
702018,495 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
55 is in the 93rd percentile; 7020 is in the 79th · 971 models
55 (A)7020 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 7020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | 55 | 7020 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 7020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | John Deere | — |
| Model | 3126 | John Deere | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 7020+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 442ci | 404ci | ▲ 55+38 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.8in | ▲ 55+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 7020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Partially synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 7020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 211in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 125in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 26,000lb | 18,495lb | ▲ 55+7,505 lb · +41% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 7020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Variable-Displacement Load-Sensing Pressure-Compensated | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Differential Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 7020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 7020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 7020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Differential Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 7020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 7020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.6gal | 8gal | ▲ 55+0.6 gal · +7% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 7020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab (standard) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 78th percentile (442 ci)B · 68th percentile (404 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 16th percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 93rd percentile (26,000 lb)B · 79th percentile (18,495 lb)
A · 55B · 7020Median Agricultural Tractor