ChallengerModel A
Challenger 55
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 442 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 55 vs John Deere 8310RT
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 8310RT
Crawler
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 548 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger 55
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 8310RT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ 8310RT higher · +106 ci (+24%)55442 ci
8310RT548 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
55 is in the 78th percentile; 8310RT is in the 90th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied556
8310RT6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
55 is in the 74th percentile; 8310RT is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied5516
8310RT16
Median Agricultural Tractor16
55 is in the 50th percentile; 8310RT is in the 50th · 972 models
Operating Weight
▲ 8310RT higher · +8,905 lb (+34%)5526,000 lb
8310RT34,905 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
55 is in the 93rd percentile; 8310RT is in the 97th · 971 models
55 (A)8310RT (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 8310RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | 55 | 8310RT | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 8310RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | John Deere | — |
| Model | 3126 | Six-cylinder vertical with two turbochargers and air-to-air aftercooler | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,099RPM | ▲ 55+1 RPM · <1% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 442ci | 548ci | ▲ 8310RT+106 ci · +24% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.7in | ▲ 8310RT+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5.4in | ▲ 8310RT+0.4 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 8310RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full power shift with selective gear fixed ratio | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 8310RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 211in | 271in | ▲ 8310RT+60 in · +28% |
| Width | Not recorded | 135in | — |
| Height | 125in | 131in | ▲ 8310RT+6 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 26,000lb | 34,905lb | ▲ 8310RT+8,905 lb · +34% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 8310RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Variable-Displacement Load-Sensing Pressure-Compensated | Hydraulic control system direct engine drive | — |
| Steering Type | Differential Power | Electro-hydraulic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 8310RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Type 4N/3 | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 8310RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Differential Power | Electro-hydraulic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 8310RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 8310RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.6gal | 10.8gal | ▲ 8310RT+2.2 gal · +26% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 55 | John Deere 8310RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 78th percentile (442 ci)B · 90th percentile (548 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 93rd percentile (26,000 lb)B · 97th percentile (34,905 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 86th percentile (211 in)B · 99th percentile (271 in)
A · 55B · 8310RTMedian Agricultural Tractor