ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65B
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65B vs Challenger MT735
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT735
Articulated
- power
- 235 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger 65B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT735
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65B higher · +50 hp (+21%)65B285 hp
MT735235 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65B is in the 64th percentile; MT735 is in the 56th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65B higher · +101 ci (+19%)65B638 ci
MT735537 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65B is in the 70th percentile; MT735 is in the 59th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65B6
MT7356
Median Crawler Tractor6
65B is in the 50th percentile; MT735 is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT735 higher · +6 (+60%)65B10
MT73516
Median Crawler Tractor10
65B is in the 50th percentile; MT735 is in the 69th · 179 models
65B (A)MT735 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 65B | MT735 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Power Output | 285hp | 235hp | ▲ 65B+50 hp · +21% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 537ci | ▲ 65B+101 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.4in | ▲ 65B+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.9in | ▲ 65B+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 107in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 24.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,030lb | 28,185lb | ▲ 65B+5,845 lb · +21% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Electro-hydraulic | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IV | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Electro-hydraulic | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65B | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 56th percentile (235 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 59th percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 69th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 71st percentile (34,030 lb)B · 64th percentile (28,185 lb)
A · 65BB · MT735Median Crawler Tractor