ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65E
Articulated
- power
- 310 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger 65E vs Challenger 75
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 75
Articulated
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
ChallengerChallenger 65E
vs
ChallengerChallenger 75
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ 75 higher · +15 hp (+5%)65E310 hp
75325 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
65E is in the 9th percentile; 75 is in the 13th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tied65E629 ci
75629 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
65E is in the 13th percentile; 75 is in the 13th · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65E6
756
Median Articulated Tractor6
65E is in the 50th percentile; 75 is in the 50th · 61 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied65E10
7510
Median Articulated Tractor16
65E is in the 3rd percentile; 75 is in the 3rd · 59 models
65E (A)75 (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 65E | 75 | — |
| Category | Articulated | Articulated | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Power Output | 310hp | 325hp | ▲ 75+15 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 629ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.9in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 5.5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | full power shift | Full Power Shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 25in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,195lb | 34,370lb | ▲ 75+175 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Closed | Same |
| Steering Type | hydrostatic differential steering | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III, IV | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | hydrostatic differential steering | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric Starter | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65E | Challenger 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | 11gal | ▲ 65E+4 gal · +36% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 9th percentile (310 hp)B · 13th percentile (325 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 13th percentile (629 ci)B · 13th percentile (629 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 3rd percentile (10)B · 3rd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 9th percentile (34,195 lb)B · 13th percentile (34,370 lb)
A · 65EB · 75Median Articulated Tractor