ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65E
Articulated
- power
- 310 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger 65E vs John Deere 8335RT
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 8335RT
Articulated
- power
- 291 hp
- displacement
- 548 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger 65E
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 8335RT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ 65E higher · +19 hp (+7%)65E310 hp
8335RT291 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
65E is in the 9th percentile; 8335RT is in the 5th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65E higher · +81 ci (+15%)65E629 ci
8335RT548 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
65E is in the 13th percentile; 8335RT is in the 4th · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65E6
8335RT6
Median Articulated Tractor6
65E is in the 50th percentile; 8335RT is in the 50th · 61 models
Forward Gears
▲ 8335RT higher · +6 (+60%)65E10
8335RT16
Median Articulated Tractor16
65E is in the 3rd percentile; 8335RT is in the 50th · 59 models
65E (A)8335RT (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65E | John Deere 8335RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | 65E | 8335RT | — |
| Category | Articulated | Articulated | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65E | John Deere 8335RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | John Deere | — |
| Model | Not recorded | PowerTech PSX | — |
| Power Output | 310hp | 291hp | ▲ 65E+19 hp · +7% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 548ci | ▲ 65E+81 ci · +15% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.7in | ▲ 65E+0.2 in · +4% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 5.4in | ▲ 65E+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65E | John Deere 8335RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | full power shift | Selective Gear Fixed Ratio with Full Range Operator Controlled Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65E | John Deere 8335RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 271in | — |
| Width | 25in | 135in | ▲ 8335RT+110 in · +440% |
| Height | Not recorded | 131in | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,195lb | 34,945lb | ▲ 8335RT+750 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65E | John Deere 8335RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Closed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated | — |
| Steering Type | hydrostatic differential steering | Electro-Hydraulic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65E | John Deere 8335RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III, IV | 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65E | John Deere 8335RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Track Tractor | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Steering Type | hydrostatic differential steering | Electro-Hydraulic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65E | John Deere 8335RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65E | John Deere 8335RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | 10.8gal | ▲ 65E+4.2 gal · +39% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 65E | John Deere 8335RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 9th percentile (310 hp)B · 5th percentile (291 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 13th percentile (629 ci)B · 4th percentile (548 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 3rd percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 9th percentile (34,195 lb)B · 15th percentile (34,945 lb)
A · 65EB · 8335RTMedian Articulated Tractor