ChallengerModel A
Challenger 75E
Agricultural
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 75E vs Challenger MT835
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT835
Agricultural
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger 75E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT835
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tied75E340 hp
MT835340 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
75E is in the 96th percentile; MT835 is in the 96th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT835 higher · +100 ci (+16%)75E629 ci
MT835729 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
75E is in the 93rd percentile; MT835 is in the 95th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied75E6
MT8356
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
75E is in the 74th percentile; MT835 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT835 higher · +6 (+60%)75E10
MT83516
Median Agricultural Tractor16
75E is in the 23rd percentile; MT835 is in the 50th · 972 models
75E (A)MT835 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 75E | MT835 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | C12 | — |
| Power Output | 340hp | 340hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 729ci | ▲ MT835+100 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 5.1in | ▲ MT835+0.2 in · +4% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 5.9in | ▲ MT835+0.4 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full Power Shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 266in | — |
| Width | 25in | 142in | ▲ MT835+117 in · +468% |
| Height | Not recorded | 139in | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,800lb | 40,000lb | ▲ MT835+5,200 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Closed Center Load Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Type IVN | — |
| Hitch Category | III, IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 96th percentile (340 hp)B · 96th percentile (340 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 93rd percentile (629 ci)B · 95th percentile (729 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 23rd percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 97th percentile (34,800 lb)B · 97th percentile (40,000 lb)
A · 75EB · MT835Median Agricultural Tractor