ChallengerModel A
Challenger 75E
Agricultural
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 75E vs New Holland 9682
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland 9682
Agricultural
- power
- 338 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger 75E
vs
New HollandNew Holland 9682
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 75E higher · +2 hp (<1%)75E340 hp
9682338 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
75E is in the 96th percentile; 9682 is in the 96th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9682 higher · +226 ci (+36%)75E629 ci
9682855 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
75E is in the 93rd percentile; 9682 is in the 97th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied75E6
96826
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
75E is in the 74th percentile; 9682 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9682 higher · +2 (+20%)75E10
968212
Median Agricultural Tractor16
75E is in the 23rd percentile; 9682 is in the 33rd · 972 models
75E (A)9682 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 75E | New Holland 9682 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | New Holland | — |
| Model | 75E | 9682 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 75E | New Holland 9682 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Cummins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | N14 | — |
| Power Output | 340hp | 338hp | ▲ 75E+2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 855ci | ▲ 9682+226 ci · +36% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 5.5in | ▲ 9682+0.6 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 6in | ▲ 9682+0.5 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 75E | New Holland 9682 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Partially Synchronized / Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 75E | New Holland 9682 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 266in | — |
| Width | 25in | 150in | ▲ 9682+125 in · +500% |
| Height | Not recorded | 147in | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,800lb | 32,030lb | ▲ 75E+2,770 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 75E | New Holland 9682 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Closed Center Load Sensing | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | Not recorded | 47.2gpm | — |
| Pressure | Not recorded | 2,305psi | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 75E | New Holland 9682 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | IVN/3 | — |
| Hitch Category | III, IV | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 15,285lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 75E | New Holland 9682 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 75E | New Holland 9682 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 75E | New Holland 9682 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | 15.6gal | ▲ 9682+0.6 gal · +4% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 75E | New Holland 9682 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 96th percentile (340 hp)B · 96th percentile (338 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 93rd percentile (629 ci)B · 97th percentile (855 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 23rd percentile (10)B · 33rd percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 97th percentile (34,800 lb)B · 96th percentile (32,030 lb)
A · 75EB · 9682Median Agricultural Tractor