Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 85E
Crawler
- power
- 375 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 85E vs Fendt 940 Vario MT
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 940 Vario MT
Crawler
- power
- 400 hp
- displacement
- 598 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 85E
vs
FendtFendt 940 Vario MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 940 Vario MT higher · +25 hp (+7%)85E375 hp
940 Vario MT400 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
85E is in the 74th percentile; 940 Vario MT is in the 75th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 85E higher · +131 ci (+22%)85E729 ci
940 Vario MT598 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
85E is in the 75th percentile; 940 Vario MT is in the 65th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 940 Vario MT higher · +1 (+17%)85E6
940 Vario MT7
Median Crawler Tractor6
85E is in the 50th percentile; 940 Vario MT is in the 97th · 192 models
Operating Weight
▲ 85E higher · +1,452 lb (+4%)85E34,895 lb
940 Vario MT33,443 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
85E is in the 73rd percentile; 940 Vario MT is in the 69th · 173 models
85E (A)940 Vario MT (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 85E | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | 85E | 940 Vario MT | — |
| Category | Crawler | Crawler | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 85E | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | AGCO Power | — |
| Power Output | 375hp | 400hp | ▲ 940 Vario MT+25 hp · +7% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,450RPM | ▲ 85E+650 RPM · +45% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 7 | ▲ 940 Vario MT+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 729ci | 598ci | ▲ 85E+131 ci · +22% |
| Bore | 5.1in | 4.4in | ▲ 85E+0.7 in · +16% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 5.7in | ▲ 85E+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 85E | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | continuously-variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 85E | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 241in | — |
| Width | 25in | 98.5in | ▲ 940 Vario MT+73.5 in · +294% |
| Height | Not recorded | 138in | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,895lb | 33,443lb | ▲ 85E+1,452 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 85E | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 85E | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | IVN/III | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 41,000lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 85E | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Tracked | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Track Drive | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 85E | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 85E | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 20gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 85E | Fendt 940 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 74th percentile (375 hp)B · 75th percentile (400 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 75th percentile (729 ci)B · 65th percentile (598 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 97th percentile (7)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 73rd percentile (34,895 lb)B · 69th percentile (33,443 lb)
Width
median 79.5 inA · 5th percentile (25 in)B · 68th percentile (98.5 in)
A · 85EB · 940 Vario MTMedian Crawler Tractor