Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 95E
Agricultural
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 95E vs Fendt 1042
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 1042
Agricultural
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 95E
vs
FendtFendt 1042
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tied95E410 hp
1042410 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
95E is in the 97th percentile; 1042 is in the 97th · 1,028 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied95E6
10426
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
95E is in the 74th percentile; 1042 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 95E higher · +3,905 lb (+12%)95E35,520 lb
104231,615 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
95E is in the 97th percentile; 1042 is in the 95th · 971 models
95E (A)1042 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | 95E | 1042 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | MAN | — |
| Power Output | 410hp | 410hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ 95E+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 729ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | 5.1in | 5in | ▲ 95E+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 6.5in | ▲ 1042+0.6 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | CVT | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 243in | — |
| Width | 25in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 142in | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 130in | — |
| Operating Weight | 35,520lb | 31,615lb | ▲ 95E+3,905 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | Not recorded | 61.3gpm | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | Not recorded | 79.9in | — |
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 74.8in | — |
| Front Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 79.9-88.6 | — |
| Rear Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 74.8-88.6 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 18,455lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Tracks | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic caliper disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier 4 | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | D.E.F. (diesel exhaust fluid) exhaust treatment | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fuel Capacity | Not recorded | 211gal | — |
| Coolant | 20gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 97th percentile (410 hp)B · 97th percentile (410 hp)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 97th percentile (35,520 lb)B · 95th percentile (31,615 lb)
A · 95EB · 1042Median Agricultural Tractor