Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger 95E
Agricultural
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 95E vs Fendt 1156 Vario MT
FendtModel B
Fendt 1156 Vario MT
Crawler
- power
- 523 hp
- displacement
- 930 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 95E
vs
FendtFendt 1156 Vario MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 1156 Vario MT higher · +113 hp (+28%)95E410 hp
1156 Vario MT523 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
95E is in the 97th percentile; 1156 Vario MT is in the 99th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1156 Vario MT higher · +201 ci (+28%)95E729 ci
1156 Vario MT930 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
95E is in the 95th percentile; 1156 Vario MT is in the 98th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied95E6
1156 Vario MT6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
95E is in the 74th percentile; 1156 Vario MT is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1156 Vario MT higher · +10,240 lb (+29%)95E35,520 lb
1156 Vario MT45,760 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
95E is in the 97th percentile; 1156 Vario MT is in the 99th · 971 models
95E (A)1156 Vario MT (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1156 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | 95E | 1156 Vario MT | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Crawler, Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1156 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | MAN | — |
| Model | Not recorded | D3876 | — |
| Power Output | 410hp | 523hp | ▲ 1156 Vario MT+113 hp · +28% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,730RPM | ▲ 95E+370 RPM · +21% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 729ci | 930ci | ▲ 1156 Vario MT+201 ci · +28% |
| Bore | 5.1in | 5.4in | ▲ 1156 Vario MT+0.3 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 6.7in | ▲ 1156 Vario MT+0.8 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1156 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Continuously-Variable Transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1156 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 266in | — |
| Width | 25in | 116in | ▲ 1156 Vario MT+91 in · +364% |
| Height | Not recorded | 148in | — |
| Operating Weight | 35,520lb | 45,760lb | ▲ 1156 Vario MT+10,240 lb · +29% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1156 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Closed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1156 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | Crawler | Same |
| Drive Type | Tracks | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic differential steering | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic caliper disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1156 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1156 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 20gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 95E | Fendt 1156 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 97th percentile (410 hp)B · 99th percentile (523 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 95th percentile (729 ci)B · 98th percentile (930 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 97th percentile (35,520 lb)B · 99th percentile (45,760 lb)
Width
median 79.5 inA · 1st percentile (25 in)B · 95th percentile (116 in)
A · 95EB · 1156 Vario MTMedian Agricultural Tractor