ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT225
Utility
- power
- 23.3 hp
- displacement
- 68.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT225 vs Ferguson TE-20
Image not recorded
FergusonModel B
Ferguson TE-20
Utility
- power
- 23.4 hp
- displacement
- 120 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
ChallengerChallenger MT225
vs
FergusonFerguson TE-20
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ TE-20 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)MT22523.3 hp
TE-2023.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT225 is in the 13th percentile; TE-20 is in the 13th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TE-20 higher · +51.5 ci (+75%)MT22568.5 ci
TE-20120 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT225 is in the 8th percentile; TE-20 is in the 28th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ TE-20 higher · +1 (+33%)MT2253
TE-204
Median Utility Tractor4
MT225 is in the 23rd percentile; TE-20 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ TE-20 higher · +1,084 lb (+65%)MT2251,672 lb
TE-202,756 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT225 is in the 8th percentile; TE-20 is in the 20th · 5,107 models
MT225 (A)TE-20 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Ferguson TE-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Ferguson | — |
| Model | MT225 | TE-20 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Ferguson TE-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Continental | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Z-120 | — |
| Power Output | 23.3hp | 23.4hp | ▲ TE-20+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ MT225+800 RPM · +40% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ TE-20+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 68.5ci | 120ci | ▲ TE-20+51.5 ci · +75% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 3.2in | ▲ TE-20+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.1in | 3.7in | ▲ TE-20+0.6 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Ferguson TE-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Ferguson TE-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 105in | 115in | ▲ TE-20+10 in · +10% |
| Width | 41in | 63.4in | ▲ TE-20+22.4 in · +55% |
| Height | 75.2in | 52in | ▲ MT225+23.2 in · +45% |
| Operating Weight | 1,672lb | 2,756lb | ▲ TE-20+1,084 lb · +65% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Ferguson TE-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Ferguson TE-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Ferguson TE-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | 1 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 694lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Ferguson TE-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential mechanical expanding shoe | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Ferguson TE-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Ferguson TE-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Open operator station | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 13th percentile (23.3 hp)B · 13th percentile (23.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 28th percentile (120 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 8th percentile (1,672 lb)B · 20th percentile (2,756 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 12th percentile (105 in)B · 20th percentile (115 in)
A · MT225B · TE-20Median Utility Tractor