ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT225
Utility
- power
- 23.3 hp
- displacement
- 68.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT225 vs Kioti CS2510
Image not recorded
KiotiModel B
Kioti CS2510
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT225
vs
KiotiKioti CS2510
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CS2510 higher · +1.2 hp (+5%)MT22523.3 hp
CS251024.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT225 is in the 13th percentile; CS2510 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CS2510 higher · +0.5 ci (<1%)MT22568.5 ci
CS251069 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT225 is in the 8th percentile; CS2510 is in the 10th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT2253
CS25103
Median Utility Tractor4
MT225 is in the 23rd percentile; CS2510 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT225 higher · +187 lb (+13%)MT2251,672 lb
CS25101,485 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT225 is in the 8th percentile; CS2510 is in the 5th · 5,107 models
MT225 (A)CS2510 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Kioti CS2510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Kioti | — |
| Model | MT225 | CS2510 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Kioti CS2510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | S773L | — |
| Power Output | 23.3hp | 24.5hp | ▲ CS2510+1.2 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ CS2510+200 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 68.5ci | 69ci | ▲ CS2510+0.5 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 3in | ▲ MT225+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.1in | 3.2in | ▲ CS2510+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Kioti CS2510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Kioti CS2510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 105in | 99.3in | ▲ MT225+5.7 in · +6% |
| Width | 41in | 46.7in | ▲ CS2510+5.7 in · +14% |
| Height | 75.2in | 88in | ▲ CS2510+12.8 in · +17% |
| Operating Weight | 1,672lb | 1,485lb | ▲ MT225+187 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Kioti CS2510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Kioti CS2510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 2,200rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Kioti CS2510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Three-point hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | 1 | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 694lb | 699lb | ▲ CS2510+5 lb · <1% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Kioti CS2510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Kioti CS2510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT225 | Kioti CS2510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Two-post folding ROPS or Cab (optional) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 13th percentile (23.3 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 10th percentile (69 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 8th percentile (1,672 lb)B · 5th percentile (1,485 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 12th percentile (105 in)B · 8th percentile (99.3 in)
A · MT225B · CS2510Median Utility Tractor