Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT225B vs Challenger MT425

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT225B

Utility

power
22.5 hp
displacement
68.5 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT225B specs
Challenger MT425 Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT425

Utility

power
Not recorded
displacement
243 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
24
Full MT425 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT225B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT425

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,933–5,720

Engine Displacement

▲ MT425 higher · +175 ci (+255%)
MT225B68.5 ci
MT425243 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT225B is in the 8th percentile; MT425 is in the 67th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ MT425 higher · +1 (+33%)
MT225B3
MT4254
Median Utility Tractor4

MT225B is in the 23rd percentile; MT425 is in the 50th · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT425 higher · +4,573 lb (+284%)
MT225B1,609 lb
MT4256,182 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT225B is in the 7th percentile; MT425 is in the 58th · 5,107 models

Width

▲ MT425 higher · +37.6 in (+95%)
MT225B39.4 in
MT42577 in
Median Utility Tractor66 in

MT225B is in the 3rd percentile; MT425 is in the 75th · 3,933 models

MT225B (A)MT425 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT425Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT225BMT425—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT425Difference
ManufacturerIsekiPerkins—
ModelE33123054—
Power Output22.5hpNot recorded—
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,200RPM▲ MT225B+400 RPM · +18%
Cylinders34▲ MT425+1 · +33%
Displacement68.5ci243ci▲ MT425+175 ci · +255%
Bore3.1in3.9in▲ MT425+0.8 in · +26%
Stroke3.1in5in▲ MT425+1.9 in · +61%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT425Difference
TypeHydrostatic24-speed power shuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT425Difference
Length102inNot recorded—
Width39.4in77in▲ MT425+37.6 in · +95%
Height65.5inNot recorded—
Operating Weight1,609lb6,182lb▲ MT425+4,573 lb · +284%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT425Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen centerSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerPower—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT425Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryIII—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—
Hitch Capacity591lbNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT425Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x2 2WD—
Drive Type4WD2WD—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerPower—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT425Difference
Battery VoltageNot recorded12V—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT425Difference
Coolant1.9galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT425Difference
TypeNot recordedROPS—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 67th percentile (243 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 7th percentile (1,609 lb)B · 58th percentile (6,182 lb)

Width

median 66 in
A · 3rd percentile (39.4 in)B · 75th percentile (77 in)
A · MT225BB · MT425Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT225BFull spec pageChallenger MT425