Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT225B
Utility
- power
- 22.5 hp
- displacement
- 68.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT225B vs Massey Ferguson GC1723E
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson GC1723E
Utility
- power
- 22.5 hp
- displacement
- 68.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT225B
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson GC1723E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT225B22.5 hp
GC1723E22.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT225B is in the 12th percentile; GC1723E is in the 12th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT225B68.5 ci
GC1723E68.5 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT225B is in the 8th percentile; GC1723E is in the 8th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT225B3
GC1723E3
Median Utility Tractor4
MT225B is in the 23rd percentile; GC1723E is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT225B higher · +88 lb (+6%)MT225B1,609 lb
GC1723E1,521 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT225B is in the 7th percentile; GC1723E is in the 6th · 5,107 models
MT225B (A)GC1723E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT225B | Massey Ferguson GC1723E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | MT225B | GC1723E | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT225B | Massey Ferguson GC1723E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Iseki | Same |
| Model | E3312 | E3112 | — |
| Power Output | 22.5hp | 22.5hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 68.5ci | 68.5ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.1in | 3.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.1in | 3.1in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT225B | Massey Ferguson GC1723E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT225B | Massey Ferguson GC1723E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 102in | 97.6in | ▲ MT225B+4.4 in · +5% |
| Width | 39.4in | 46.7in | ▲ GC1723E+7.3 in · +19% |
| Height | 65.5in | 72.8in | ▲ GC1723E+7.3 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 1,609lb | 1,521lb | ▲ MT225B+88 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT225B | Massey Ferguson GC1723E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT225B | Massey Ferguson GC1723E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 591lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT225B | Massey Ferguson GC1723E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT225B | Massey Ferguson GC1723E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT225B | Massey Ferguson GC1723E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 12th percentile (22.5 hp)B · 12th percentile (22.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 7th percentile (1,609 lb)B · 6th percentile (1,521 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 10th percentile (102 in)B · 7th percentile (97.6 in)
A · MT225BB · GC1723EMedian Utility Tractor