Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT255 vs Challenger MT255B

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT255

Utility

power
28.4 hp
displacement
89.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
9
Full MT255 specs
Challenger MT255B Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT255B

Utility

power
28.4 hp
displacement
89.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT255B specs
ChallengerChallenger MT255
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT255B

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
MT25528.4 hp
MT255B28.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT255 is in the 20th percentile; MT255B is in the 20th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
MT25589.3 ci
MT255B89.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT255 is in the 15th percentile; MT255B is in the 15th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT2553
MT255B3
Median Utility Tractor4

MT255 is in the 23rd percentile; MT255B is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT255B higher · +175 lb (+8%)
MT2552,248 lb
MT255B2,423 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT255 is in the 14th percentile; MT255B is in the 15th · 5,107 models

MT255 (A)MT255B (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT255BDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT255MT255B—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT255BDifference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
ModelNot recordedE3CF—
Power Output28.4hp28.4hpSame
Rated RPM2,500RPM2,500RPMSame
Cylinders33Same
Displacement89.3ci89.3ciSame
Bore3.4in3.4inSame
Stroke3.3in3.3inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT255BDifference
TypeConstant meshHydrostatic—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT255BDifference
Length117in112in▲ MT255+5 in · +4%
Width51in50.6in▲ MT255+0.4 in · <1%
Height79.3in80.7in▲ MT255B+1.4 in · +2%
Operating Weight2,248lb2,423lb▲ MT255B+175 lb · +8%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT255BDifference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen CenterSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT255BDifference
Hitch TypeCAT I3 Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryIISame
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—
Hitch Capacity1,323lb1,609lb▲ MT255B+286 lb · +22%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT255BDifference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT255BDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT255BDifference
CoolantNot recorded1.5gal—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT255BDifference
TypeOpen, ROPSOpen—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)B · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 14th percentile (2,248 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,423 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 23rd percentile (117 in)B · 18th percentile (112 in)
A · MT255B · MT255BMedian Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT255Full spec pageChallenger MT255B