Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT255
Utility
- power
- 28.4 hp
- displacement
- 89.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT255 vs Massey Ferguson 1528
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 1528
Utility
- power
- 28.4 hp
- displacement
- 89.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
ChallengerChallenger MT255
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1528
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT25528.4 hp
152828.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT255 is in the 20th percentile; 1528 is in the 20th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT25589.3 ci
152889.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT255 is in the 15th percentile; 1528 is in the 15th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT2553
15283
Median Utility Tractor4
MT255 is in the 23rd percentile; 1528 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT2559
15289
Median Utility Tractor12
MT255 is in the 35th percentile; 1528 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
MT255 (A)1528 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Massey Ferguson 1528 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | MT255 | 1528 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Massey Ferguson 1528 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Iseki | Same |
| Power Output | 28.4hp | 28.4hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 89.3ci | 89.3ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Massey Ferguson 1528 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant mesh | 9-speed gear and hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Massey Ferguson 1528 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 117in | 112in | ▲ MT255+5 in · +4% |
| Width | 51in | 53.5in | ▲ 1528+2.5 in · +5% |
| Height | 79.3in | 80.7in | ▲ 1528+1.4 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 2,248lb | 2,423lb | ▲ 1528+175 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Massey Ferguson 1528 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Massey Ferguson 1528 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | CAT I | Category 1 | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,323lb | 2,425lb | ▲ 1528+1,102 lb · +83% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Massey Ferguson 1528 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Massey Ferguson 1528 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Massey Ferguson 1528 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Massey Ferguson 1528 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open, ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)B · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 35th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 14th percentile (2,248 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,423 lb)
A · MT255B · 1528Median Utility Tractor