Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT255 vs Massey Ferguson 1529

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT255

Utility

power
28.4 hp
displacement
89.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
9
Full MT255 specs
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B

Massey Ferguson 1529

Utility

power
28.4 hp
displacement
91.4 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
8
Full 1529 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT255
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1529

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,933–5,720

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
MT25528.4 hp
152928.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT255 is in the 20th percentile; 1529 is in the 20th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 1529 higher · +2.1 ci (+2%)
MT25589.3 ci
152991.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT255 is in the 15th percentile; 1529 is in the 18th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT2553
15293
Median Utility Tractor4

MT255 is in the 23rd percentile; 1529 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT255 higher · +1 (+13%)
MT2559
15298
Median Utility Tractor12

MT255 is in the 35th percentile; 1529 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models

MT255 (A)1529 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT255Massey Ferguson 1529Difference
ManufacturerChallengerMassey Ferguson—
ModelMT2551529—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT255Massey Ferguson 1529Difference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
Power Output28.4hp28.4hpSame
Rated RPM2,500RPM2,500RPMSame
Cylinders33Same
Displacement89.3ci91.4ci▲ 1529+2.1 ci · +2%
Bore3.4in3.4inSame
Stroke3.3in3.3inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT255Massey Ferguson 1529Difference
TypeConstant meshSynchroShuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT255Massey Ferguson 1529Difference
Length117in121in▲ 1529+4 in · +3%
Width51in58.1in▲ 1529+7.1 in · +14%
Height79.3in97in▲ 1529+17.7 in · +22%
Operating Weight2,248lb2,579lb▲ 1529+331 lb · +15%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT255Massey Ferguson 1529Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen centerSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT255Massey Ferguson 1529Difference
Hitch TypeCAT INot recorded—
Hitch CategoryINot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—
Hitch Capacity1,323lbNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT255Massey Ferguson 1529Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT255Massey Ferguson 1529Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT255Massey Ferguson 1529Difference
CoolantNot recorded1.6gal—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT255Massey Ferguson 1529Difference
TypeOpen, ROPSNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)B · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 35th percentile (9)B · 23rd percentile (8)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 14th percentile (2,248 lb)B · 18th percentile (2,579 lb)
A · MT255B · 1529Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT255Full spec pageMassey Ferguson 1529