Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT255B vs Massey Ferguson 1529

Challenger MT255B Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT255B

Utility

power
28.4 hp
displacement
89.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT255B specs
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B

Massey Ferguson 1529

Utility

power
28.4 hp
displacement
91.4 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
8
Full 1529 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT255B
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1529

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,933–5,720

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
MT255B28.4 hp
152928.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT255B is in the 20th percentile; 1529 is in the 20th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 1529 higher · +2.1 ci (+2%)
MT255B89.3 ci
152991.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT255B is in the 15th percentile; 1529 is in the 18th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT255B3
15293
Median Utility Tractor4

MT255B is in the 23rd percentile; 1529 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ 1529 higher · +156 lb (+6%)
MT255B2,423 lb
15292,579 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT255B is in the 15th percentile; 1529 is in the 18th · 5,107 models

MT255B (A)1529 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT255BMassey Ferguson 1529Difference
ManufacturerChallengerMassey Ferguson—
ModelMT255B1529—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT255BMassey Ferguson 1529Difference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
ModelE3CFNot recorded—
Power Output28.4hp28.4hpSame
Rated RPM2,500RPM2,500RPMSame
Cylinders33Same
Displacement89.3ci91.4ci▲ 1529+2.1 ci · +2%
Bore3.4in3.4inSame
Stroke3.3in3.3inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT255BMassey Ferguson 1529Difference
TypeHydrostaticSynchroShuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT255BMassey Ferguson 1529Difference
Length112in121in▲ 1529+9 in · +8%
Width50.6in58.1in▲ 1529+7.5 in · +15%
Height80.7in97in▲ 1529+16.3 in · +20%
Operating Weight2,423lb2,579lb▲ 1529+156 lb · +6%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT255BMassey Ferguson 1529Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen centerSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT255BMassey Ferguson 1529Difference
Hitch Type3 Point HitchNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryINot recorded—
Hitch Capacity1,609lbNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT255BMassey Ferguson 1529Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT255BMassey Ferguson 1529Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT255BMassey Ferguson 1529Difference
Coolant1.5gal1.6gal▲ 1529+0.2 gal · +14%

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT255BMassey Ferguson 1529Difference
TypeOpenNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)B · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 15th percentile (2,423 lb)B · 18th percentile (2,579 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 18th percentile (112 in)B · 28th percentile (121 in)
A · MT255BB · 1529Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT255BFull spec pageMassey Ferguson 1529