Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT265B
Utility
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT265B vs Kubota L3301
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota L3301
Utility
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- 111 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
ChallengerChallenger MT265B
vs
KubotaKubota L3301
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT265B33 hp
L330133 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT265B is in the 25th percentile; L3301 is in the 25th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ L3301 higher · +19.6 ci (+21%)MT265B91.4 ci
L3301111 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT265B is in the 18th percentile; L3301 is in the 26th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT265B3
L33013
Median Utility Tractor4
MT265B is in the 23rd percentile; L3301 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT265B8
L33018
Median Utility Tractor12
MT265B is in the 23rd percentile; L3301 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
MT265B (A)L3301 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT265B | Kubota L3301 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Kubota | — |
| Model | MT265B | L3301 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT265B | Kubota L3301 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Kubota | — |
| Model | E3CD-VB40 | D1803 | — |
| Power Output | 33hp | 33hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ L3301+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.4ci | 111ci | ▲ L3301+19.6 ci · +21% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 4in | ▲ L3301+0.7 in · +21% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT265B | Kubota L3301 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | SynchroShuttle | Gear shift with dry type dual stage clutch | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT265B | Kubota L3301 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 121in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 62.2in | 55.1in | ▲ MT265B+7.1 in · +13% |
| Height | 87.4in | 91.7in | ▲ L3301+4.3 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 3,136lb | 2,557lb | ▲ MT265B+579 lb · +23% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT265B | Kubota L3301 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Integral type power steering | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT265B | Kubota L3301 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Live | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT265B | Kubota L3301 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Category I | Same |
| Hitch Category | 1 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 2,535lb | 1,985lb | ▲ MT265B+550 lb · +28% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT265B | Kubota L3301 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | Four Wheel Drive (4WD) | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Integral type power steering | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disk | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT265B | Kubota L3301 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT265B | Kubota L3301 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.8gal | 1.6gal | ▲ MT265B+0.2 gal · +12% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT265B | Kubota L3301 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Open operator station with two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 25th percentile (33 hp)B · 25th percentile (33 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 26th percentile (111 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 25th percentile (3,136 lb)B · 17th percentile (2,557 lb)
A · MT265BB · L3301Median Utility Tractor