Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT265B vs Massey Ferguson 1736

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT265B

Utility

power
33 hp
displacement
91.4 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
8
Full MT265B specs
Massey Ferguson 1736 Tractor
Massey FergusonModel B

Massey Ferguson 1736

Utility

power
36.2 hp
displacement
101 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
12
Full 1736 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT265B
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1736

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ 1736 higher · +3.2 hp (+10%)
MT265B33 hp
173636.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT265B is in the 25th percentile; 1736 is in the 30th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 1736 higher · +9.6 ci (+11%)
MT265B91.4 ci
1736101 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT265B is in the 18th percentile; 1736 is in the 24th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT265B3
17363
Median Utility Tractor4

MT265B is in the 23rd percentile; 1736 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ 1736 higher · +4 (+50%)
MT265B8
173612
Median Utility Tractor12

MT265B is in the 23rd percentile; 1736 is in the 50th · 4,941 models

MT265B (A)1736 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT265BMassey Ferguson 1736Difference
ManufacturerChallengerMassey Ferguson—
ModelMT265B1736—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT265BMassey Ferguson 1736Difference
ManufacturerIsekiMitsubishi—
ModelE3CD-VB40K38—
Power Output33hp36.2hp▲ 1736+3.2 hp · +10%
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,500RPM▲ MT265B+100 RPM · +4%
Cylinders33Same
Displacement91.4ci101ci▲ 1736+9.6 ci · +11%
Bore3.4in3.4inSame
Stroke3.3in3.7in▲ 1736+0.4 in · +12%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT265BMassey Ferguson 1736Difference
TypeSynchroShuttlePower shuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT265BMassey Ferguson 1736Difference
Length121in122in▲ 1736+1 in · <1%
Width62.2in64.2in▲ 1736+2 in · +3%
Height87.4in90.9in▲ 1736+3.5 in · +4%
Operating Weight3,136lb3,362lb▲ 1736+226 lb · +7%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT265BMassey Ferguson 1736Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen center gear pump—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT265BMassey Ferguson 1736Difference
TypeNot recordedIndependent Rear PTO—
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT265BMassey Ferguson 1736Difference
Hitch TypeCategory IThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch Category1I—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity2,535lb2,535lbSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT265BMassey Ferguson 1736Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive TypeFour Wheel Drive (4WD)4WD—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame
Brake TypeNot recordedWet disc—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT265BMassey Ferguson 1736Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT265BMassey Ferguson 1736Difference
Coolant1.8galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT265BMassey Ferguson 1736Difference
TypeOpenTwo-post foldable ROPS—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 25th percentile (33 hp)B · 30th percentile (36.2 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 24th percentile (101 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 25th percentile (3,136 lb)B · 27th percentile (3,362 lb)
A · MT265BB · 1736Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT265BFull spec pageMassey Ferguson 1736