Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT275B vs Challenger MT295

Challenger MT275B Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT275B

Utility

power
40.1 hp
displacement
91.4 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
8
Full MT275B specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT295

Utility

power
44.2 hp
displacement
134 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
16
Full MT295 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT275B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT295

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT295 higher · +4.1 hp (+10%)
MT275B40.1 hp
MT29544.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT275B is in the 34th percentile; MT295 is in the 38th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT295 higher · +42.6 ci (+47%)
MT275B91.4 ci
MT295134 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT275B is in the 18th percentile; MT295 is in the 32nd · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ MT295 higher · +1 (+33%)
MT275B3
MT2954
Median Utility Tractor4

MT275B is in the 23rd percentile; MT295 is in the 50th · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT295 higher · +8 (+100%)
MT275B8
MT29516
Median Utility Tractor12

MT275B is in the 23rd percentile; MT295 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models

MT275B (A)MT295 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT275BChallenger MT295Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT275BMT295—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT275BChallenger MT295Difference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
ModelE3CD-VTB10Not recorded—
Power Output40.1hp44.2hp▲ MT295+4.1 hp · +10%
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,500RPM▲ MT275B+100 RPM · +4%
Cylinders34▲ MT295+1 · +33%
Displacement91.4ci134ci▲ MT295+42.6 ci · +47%
Bore3.4in3.4inSame
Stroke3.3in3.6in▲ MT295+0.3 in · +9%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT275BChallenger MT295Difference
TypeHydrostatic/SynchroShuttlePower shuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT275BChallenger MT295Difference
Length121in141in▲ MT295+20 in · +17%
Width62.2in71.5in▲ MT295+9.3 in · +15%
Height87.4in95.9in▲ MT295+8.5 in · +10%
Operating Weight3,169lb4,277lb▲ MT295+1,108 lb · +35%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT275BChallenger MT295Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen centerSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Tires

SpecChallenger MT275BChallenger MT295Difference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded9.5-16—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded13.6-28—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT275BChallenger MT295Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryIISame
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—
Hitch Capacity2,535lb2,600lb▲ MT295+65 lb · +3%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT275BChallenger MT295Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT275BChallenger MT295Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT275BChallenger MT295Difference
Coolant1.8galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT275BChallenger MT295Difference
TypeNot recordedROPS—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 34th percentile (40.1 hp)B · 38th percentile (44.2 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 32nd percentile (134 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 73rd percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 25th percentile (3,169 lb)B · 41st percentile (4,277 lb)
A · MT275BB · MT295Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT275BFull spec pageChallenger MT295