Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT275B vs Massey Ferguson 1749

Challenger MT275B Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT275B

Utility

power
40.1 hp
displacement
91.4 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
8
Full MT275B specs
Massey Ferguson 1749 Tractor
Massey FergusonModel B

Massey Ferguson 1749

Utility

power
48.3 hp
displacement
101 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
12
Full 1749 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT275B
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1749

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ 1749 higher · +8.2 hp (+20%)
MT275B40.1 hp
174948.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT275B is in the 34th percentile; 1749 is in the 43rd · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 1749 higher · +9.6 ci (+11%)
MT275B91.4 ci
1749101 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT275B is in the 18th percentile; 1749 is in the 24th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT275B3
17493
Median Utility Tractor4

MT275B is in the 23rd percentile; 1749 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ 1749 higher · +4 (+50%)
MT275B8
174912
Median Utility Tractor12

MT275B is in the 23rd percentile; 1749 is in the 50th · 4,941 models

MT275B (A)1749 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT275BMassey Ferguson 1749Difference
ManufacturerChallengerMassey Ferguson—
ModelMT275B1749—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT275BMassey Ferguson 1749Difference
ManufacturerIsekiMitsubishi—
ModelE3CD-VTB10K38—
Power Output40.1hp48.3hp▲ 1749+8.2 hp · +20%
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,500RPM▲ MT275B+100 RPM · +4%
Cylinders33Same
Displacement91.4ci101ci▲ 1749+9.6 ci · +11%
Bore3.4in3.4inSame
Stroke3.3in3.7in▲ 1749+0.4 in · +12%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT275BMassey Ferguson 1749Difference
TypeHydrostatic/SynchroShuttlePower shuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT275BMassey Ferguson 1749Difference
Length121in132in▲ 1749+11 in · +9%
Width62.2in65.4in▲ 1749+3.2 in · +5%
Height87.4in92.9in▲ 1749+5.5 in · +6%
Operating Weight3,169lb3,913lb▲ 1749+744 lb · +23%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT275BMassey Ferguson 1749Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen center gear pump—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT275BMassey Ferguson 1749Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryIISame
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity2,535lb2,535lbSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT275BMassey Ferguson 1749Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame
Brake TypeNot recordedInternal wet disc brakes—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT275BMassey Ferguson 1749Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecChallenger MT275BMassey Ferguson 1749Difference
Control SystemNot recordedDOC and DPF—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT275BMassey Ferguson 1749Difference
Coolant1.8galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT275BMassey Ferguson 1749Difference
TypeNot recordedROPS—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 34th percentile (40.1 hp)B · 43rd percentile (48.3 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 24th percentile (101 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 25th percentile (3,169 lb)B · 36th percentile (3,913 lb)
A · MT275BB · 1749Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT275BFull spec pageMassey Ferguson 1749