Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT285 vs Massey Ferguson 1739E

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT285

Utility

power
40.1 hp
displacement
91.4 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
16
Full MT285 specs
Massey Ferguson 1739E Tractor
Massey FergusonModel B

Massey Ferguson 1739E

Utility

power
39.5 hp
displacement
91.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
9
Full 1739E specs
ChallengerChallenger MT285
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1739E

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT285 higher · +0.6 hp (+2%)
MT28540.1 hp
1739E39.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT285 is in the 34th percentile; 1739E is in the 33rd · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT285 higher · +0.1 ci (<1%)
MT28591.4 ci
1739E91.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT285 is in the 18th percentile; 1739E is in the 17th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT2853
1739E3
Median Utility Tractor4

MT285 is in the 23rd percentile; 1739E is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT285 higher · +7 (+78%)
MT28516
1739E9
Median Utility Tractor12

MT285 is in the 73rd percentile; 1739E is in the 35th · 4,941 models

MT285 (A)1739E (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT285Massey Ferguson 1739EDifference
ManufacturerChallengerMassey Ferguson—
ModelMT2851739E—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT285Massey Ferguson 1739EDifference
ManufacturerIsekiShibaura—
ModelNot recordedN843T-F—
Power Output40.1hp39.5hp▲ MT285+0.6 hp · +2%
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,600RPMSame
Cylinders33Same
Displacement91.4ci91.3ci▲ MT285+0.1 ci · <1%
Bore3.4in3.3in▲ MT285+0.1 in · +3%
Stroke3.3in3.5in▲ 1739E+0.2 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT285Massey Ferguson 1739EDifference
TypeSynchronized Power ShuttleGear—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT285Massey Ferguson 1739EDifference
Length122in116in▲ MT285+6 in · +5%
Width60.6in52.4in▲ MT285+8.2 in · +16%
Height93.2in97.2in▲ 1739E+4 in · +4%
Operating Weight3,174lb2,756lb▲ MT285+418 lb · +15%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT285Massey Ferguson 1739EDifference
System TypeOpen centerOpen center gear pump—
Steering TypePowerHydrostatic power—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT285Massey Ferguson 1739EDifference
TypeNot recordedLive—
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT285Massey Ferguson 1739EDifference
Hitch Type3 PointThree-point hitch—
Hitch CategoryIISame
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—
Hitch Capacity2,100lb2,205lb▲ 1739E+105 lb · +5%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT285Massey Ferguson 1739EDifference
Chassis Type4x44x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive Type4WDMFWD 4WD—
Steering TypePowerHydrostatic power—
Brake TypeNot recordedWet disc—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT285Massey Ferguson 1739EDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecChallenger MT285Massey Ferguson 1739EDifference
Control SystemNot recordediEGR, DOC, regenerating DPF—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT285Massey Ferguson 1739EDifference
CoolantNot recorded1.3gal—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT285Massey Ferguson 1739EDifference
TypeROPSTwo-post foldable ROPS—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 34th percentile (40.1 hp)B · 33rd percentile (39.5 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 35th percentile (9)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 25th percentile (3,174 lb)B · 20th percentile (2,756 lb)
A · MT285B · 1739EMedian Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT285Full spec pageMassey Ferguson 1739E