Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT285B vs Challenger MT295

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT285B

Utility

power
47.5 hp
displacement
134 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
8
Full MT285B specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT295

Utility

power
44.2 hp
displacement
134 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
16
Full MT295 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT285B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT295

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT285B higher · +3.3 hp (+7%)
MT285B47.5 hp
MT29544.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT285B is in the 43rd percentile; MT295 is in the 38th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
MT285B134 ci
MT295134 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT285B is in the 32nd percentile; MT295 is in the 32nd · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT285B4
MT2954
Median Utility Tractor4

MT285B is in the 50th percentile; MT295 is in the 50th · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT295 higher · +8 (+100%)
MT285B8
MT29516
Median Utility Tractor12

MT285B is in the 23rd percentile; MT295 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models

MT285B (A)MT295 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT285BChallenger MT295Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT285BMT295—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT285BChallenger MT295Difference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
ModelE4CGNot recorded—
Power Output47.5hp44.2hp▲ MT285B+3.3 hp · +7%
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,500RPM▲ MT285B+100 RPM · +4%
Cylinders44Same
Displacement134ci134ciSame
Bore3.4in3.4inSame
Stroke3.6in3.6inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT285BChallenger MT295Difference
TypeHydrostatic / SynchroshuttlePower shuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT285BChallenger MT295Difference
Length133in141in▲ MT295+8 in · +6%
Width65.4in71.5in▲ MT295+6.1 in · +9%
Height89.1in95.9in▲ MT295+6.8 in · +8%
Operating Weight3,660lb4,277lb▲ MT295+617 lb · +17%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT285BChallenger MT295Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen centerSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Tires

SpecChallenger MT285BChallenger MT295Difference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded9.5-16—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded13.6-28—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT285BChallenger MT295Difference
Hitch Type3 PointThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryIISame
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—
Hitch Capacity3,086lb2,600lb▲ MT285B+486 lb · +19%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT285BChallenger MT295Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT285BChallenger MT295Difference
Starter TypeNot recordedElectric—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT285BChallenger MT295Difference
Coolant2galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT285BChallenger MT295Difference
TypeOpen StationROPS—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 43rd percentile (47.5 hp)B · 38th percentile (44.2 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 32nd percentile (134 ci)B · 32nd percentile (134 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 73rd percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 31st percentile (3,660 lb)B · 41st percentile (4,277 lb)
A · MT285BB · MT295Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT285BFull spec pageChallenger MT295