Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT285B
Utility
- power
- 47.5 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT285B vs Ford-New Holland 3910
Image not recorded
Ford-New HollandModel B
Ford-New Holland 3910
Utility
- power
- 47.5 hp
- displacement
- 192 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
ChallengerChallenger MT285B
vs
Ford-New HollandFord-New Holland 3910
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT285B47.5 hp
391047.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT285B is in the 43rd percentile; 3910 is in the 43rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 3910 higher · +58 ci (+43%)MT285B134 ci
3910192 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT285B is in the 32nd percentile; 3910 is in the 51st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT285B higher · +1 (+33%)MT285B4
39103
Median Utility Tractor4
MT285B is in the 50th percentile; 3910 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT285B8
39108
Median Utility Tractor12
MT285B is in the 23rd percentile; 3910 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
MT285B (A)3910 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Ford-New Holland 3910 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Ford-New Holland | — |
| Model | MT285B | 3910 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Ford-New Holland 3910 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Ford | — |
| Model | E4CG | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 47.5hp | 47.5hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT285B+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ MT285B+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 134ci | 192ci | ▲ 3910+58 ci · +43% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 4.4in | ▲ 3910+1 in · +29% |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 4.2in | ▲ 3910+0.6 in · +17% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Ford-New Holland 3910 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic / Synchroshuttle | Synchromesh, Mechanical shuttle, Dual Range | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Ford-New Holland 3910 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 133in | 127in | ▲ MT285B+6 in · +5% |
| Width | 65.4in | 69.6in | ▲ 3910+4.2 in · +6% |
| Height | 89.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,660lb | 4,615lb | ▲ 3910+955 lb · +26% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Ford-New Holland 3910 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power assist | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Ford-New Holland 3910 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3 Point | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,086lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Ford-New Holland 3910 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power assist | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Ford-New Holland 3910 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Ford-New Holland 3910 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2gal | 2.8gal | ▲ 3910+0.8 gal · +40% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | Ford-New Holland 3910 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open Station | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 43rd percentile (47.5 hp)B · 43rd percentile (47.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 32nd percentile (134 ci)B · 51st percentile (192 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 31st percentile (3,660 lb)B · 44th percentile (4,615 lb)
A · MT285BB · 3910Median Utility Tractor