Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT285B
Utility
- power
- 47.5 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT285B vs McCormick Intl GM50
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl GM50
Utility
- power
- 47.5 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT285B
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl GM50
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT285B47.5 hp
GM5047.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT285B is in the 43rd percentile; GM50 is in the 43rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT285B134 ci
GM50134 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT285B is in the 32nd percentile; GM50 is in the 31st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT285B4
GM504
Median Utility Tractor4
MT285B is in the 50th percentile; GM50 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GM50 higher · +8 (+100%)MT285B8
GM5016
Median Utility Tractor12
MT285B is in the 23rd percentile; GM50 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
MT285B (A)GM50 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | McCormick Intl GM50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | MT285B | GM50 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | McCormick Intl GM50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Yanmar | — |
| Model | E4CG | 4TNV88 | — |
| Power Output | 47.5hp | 47.5hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ GM50+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 134ci | 134ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.5in | ▲ GM50+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 3.5in | ▲ MT285B+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | McCormick Intl GM50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic / Synchroshuttle | Creeper | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | McCormick Intl GM50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 133in | 130in | ▲ MT285B+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 65.4in | 55in | ▲ MT285B+10.4 in · +19% |
| Height | 89.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,660lb | 3,197lb | ▲ MT285B+463 lb · +14% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | McCormick Intl GM50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | McCormick Intl GM50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3 Point | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,086lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | McCormick Intl GM50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | McCormick Intl GM50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | McCormick Intl GM50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT285B | McCormick Intl GM50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open Station | ROPS/Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 43rd percentile (47.5 hp)B · 43rd percentile (47.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 32nd percentile (134 ci)B · 31st percentile (134 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 31st percentile (3,660 lb)B · 25th percentile (3,197 lb)
A · MT285BB · GM50Median Utility Tractor