Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT295 vs Challenger MT297

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT295

Utility

power
44.2 hp
displacement
134 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
16
Full MT295 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT297

Utility

power
55.3 hp
displacement
173 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
12
Full MT297 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT295
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT297

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT297 higher · +11.1 hp (+25%)
MT29544.2 hp
MT29755.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT295 is in the 38th percentile; MT297 is in the 50th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT297 higher · +39 ci (+29%)
MT295134 ci
MT297173 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT295 is in the 32nd percentile; MT297 is in the 46th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT2954
MT2974
Median Utility Tractor4

MT295 is in the 50th percentile; MT297 is in the 50th · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT295 higher · +4 (+33%)
MT29516
MT29712
Median Utility Tractor12

MT295 is in the 73rd percentile; MT297 is in the 50th · 4,941 models

MT295 (A)MT297 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT295Challenger MT297Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT295MT297—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT295Challenger MT297Difference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
Power Output44.2hp55.3hp▲ MT297+11.1 hp · +25%
Rated RPM2,500RPM2,500RPMSame
Cylinders44Same
Displacement134ci173ci▲ MT297+39 ci · +29%
Bore3.4inNot recorded—
Stroke3.6inNot recorded—

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT295Challenger MT297Difference
TypePower shuttleMechanical shuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT295Challenger MT297Difference
Length141in137in▲ MT295+4 in · +3%
Width71.5in71.5inSame
Height95.9in95.5in▲ MT295+0.4 in · <1%
Operating Weight4,277lb3,878lb▲ MT295+399 lb · +10%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT295Challenger MT297Difference
System TypeOpen centerOpen CenterSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Tires

SpecChallenger MT295Challenger MT297Difference
Front Tire Size9.5-16Not recorded—
Rear Tire Size13.6-28Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT295Challenger MT297Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point Hitch3 Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryIISame
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—
Hitch Capacity2,600lb2,600lbSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT295Challenger MT297Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT295Challenger MT297Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT295Challenger MT297Difference
TypeROPSROPSSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 38th percentile (44.2 hp)B · 50th percentile (55.3 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 32nd percentile (134 ci)B · 46th percentile (173 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 41st percentile (4,277 lb)B · 35th percentile (3,878 lb)
A · MT295B · MT297Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT295Full spec pageChallenger MT297