Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT295
Utility
- power
- 44.2 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT295 vs Massey Ferguson 1445
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 1445
Utility
- power
- 44.2 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT295
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1445
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT29544.2 hp
144544.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT295 is in the 38th percentile; 1445 is in the 38th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT295134 ci
1445134 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT295 is in the 32nd percentile; 1445 is in the 32nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT2954
14454
Median Utility Tractor4
MT295 is in the 50th percentile; 1445 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT295 higher · +413 lb (+11%)MT2954,277 lb
14453,864 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT295 is in the 41st percentile; 1445 is in the 35th · 5,107 models
MT295 (A)1445 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Massey Ferguson 1445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | MT295 | 1445 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Massey Ferguson 1445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Iseki | Same |
| Power Output | 44.2hp | 44.2hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 134ci | 134ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.6in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Massey Ferguson 1445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power shuttle | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Massey Ferguson 1445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 141in | 137in | ▲ MT295+4 in · +3% |
| Width | 71.5in | 69.1in | ▲ MT295+2.4 in · +3% |
| Height | 95.9in | 97.2in | ▲ 1445+1.3 in · +1% |
| Operating Weight | 4,277lb | 3,864lb | ▲ MT295+413 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Massey Ferguson 1445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Massey Ferguson 1445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 9.5-16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 13.6-28 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Massey Ferguson 1445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 2,600lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Massey Ferguson 1445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Massey Ferguson 1445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Massey Ferguson 1445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 38th percentile (44.2 hp)B · 38th percentile (44.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 32nd percentile (134 ci)B · 32nd percentile (134 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 41st percentile (4,277 lb)B · 35th percentile (3,864 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 56th percentile (141 in)B · 50th percentile (137 in)
A · MT295B · 1445Median Utility Tractor